Challenging the Utility of a Racial Microaggressions Framework Through A Systematic Review of Racially Biased Incidents on Campus
Challenging the Utility of a Racial Microaggressions Framework Through A Systematic Review of Racially Biased Incidents on Campus
复制标题
通过对校园种族偏见事件的系统审查来挑战种族微侵犯框架的实用性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Marc P. Johnston
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gina A. Garcia;Marc P. Johnston
尽管声称处于“后殖民主义”时代，但种族偏见事件在美国各地的大学校园中普遍存在，媒体对此类事件的持续报道就是明证。在认识到这些事件的复杂性，我们试图提供一个当代审查的种族偏见的事件在大学校园，并探讨在何种程度上，他们代表的种族microaggression与更公开的形式的种族主义的隐蔽形式。我们对2005年8月1日至2010年5月1日期间发生在大学校园内的所有新闻种族偏见事件进行了内容分析，确定了205起事件。我们将这些事件按交付方式，种族内容/象征意义和种族（微）侵略类型进行分类。虽然其中一些事件可以通过微观侵略框架得到最好的理解，但许多事件是公然的种族主义，不符合理论。高等教育和学生事务研究人员和从业人员必须了解这些事件的复杂性，认识到公开和隐蔽形式的种族主义在校园里普遍存在。
Despite claims of being in a “postracial” era, racially biased incidents pervade college and university campuses across the U.S., as evidenced in the continual media coverage of such incidents. In recognizing the complexities of these incidents, we sought to offer a contemporary review of racially biased incidents on college and university campuses and to explore the extent to which they represent covert forms of racial microaggressions versus more overt forms of racism. We conducted a content analysis of all news-making racially biased incidents that occurred on college and university campuses between August 1, 2005 and May 1, 2010, identifying 205 incidents. We classified these incidents by mode of delivery, racial content/symbolism, and type of racial (micro)aggression. While a number of these incidents can be best understood through a microaggressions framework, many are blatantly racist and do not fit the theory. Higher education and student affairs researchers and practitioners must understand these incidents for their complexities, recognizing that both overt and covert forms of racism are prevalent on campus.