Collateral damage - Impact of a pandemic on stroke emergency services

Collateral damage - Impact of a pandemic on stroke emergency services
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104988
复制
发表时间:
2020-08-01
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Jadhav, Ashutosh P.
Jadhav, Ashutosh P.
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Desai, Shashvat M.;Guyette, Francis X.;Jadhav, Ashutosh P.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:COVID-19大流行对中风护理的影响是双重的-感染的直接影响和对非COVID-19疾病的间接影响。传闻证据和临床观察表明,在大流行期间,出现中风的患者人数有所减少。我们旨在了解COVID-19大流行对单一综合性卒中中心(CSC)卒中急救服务利用率的影响。研究方法:我们对前瞻性维护的数据库进行了回顾性分析,并将2017年3月至2019年3月收治的所有急诊科(艾德)就诊、急性卒中入院(包括TIA)和血栓切除术病例与2020年3月在综合性卒中中心收治的患者进行了比较。结果如下:与2020年3月相比,2017年3月至2019年3月期间总艾德发生率(22%,p = 0.005)、急性缺血性卒中(40%,p =0.001)和TIA(60%,p=0.163)下降。2020年3月接受EVT的患者数量与2017年3月至2019年3月相当(p=0.430)。结论:流行病相关的居家政策降低了CSC卒中急救服务的利用率。这种影响似乎在艾德、所有卒中入院和TIA中更为突出,而对重度卒中的影响较小。鉴于本地区COVID-19病例的患病率相对较低,这种减少可能与寻求医疗保健的行为有关,而不是能力饱和。
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on stroke care is two-fold - direct impact of the infection and indirect impact on non-COVID-19 diseases. Anecdotal evidence and clinical observation suggest that there is a decrease in the number of patients presenting with stroke during the pandemic. We aim to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the utilization of stroke emergency services on a single comprehensive stroke center (CSC). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database and compared all emergency department (ED) encounters, acute stroke admissions (including TIA), and thrombectomy cases admitted in March 2017-2019 to patients admitted in March 2020 at a comprehensive stroke center. Results: Number of total ED encounters (22%, p=0.005), acute ischemic strokes (40%, p=0.001), and TIAs (60%, p=0.163) decreased between March of 2017-2019 compared to March of 2020. The number of patients undergoing EVT in March 2020 was comparable to March 2017-2019 (p=0.430). Conclusion: A pandemic-related stay-at-home policy reduces the utilization of stroke emergency services at a CSC. This effect appears to be more prominent for ED encounters, all stroke admissions and TIAs, and less impactful for severe strokes. Given the relatively low prevalence of COVID-19 cases in our region, this decrement is likely related to healthcare seeking behavior rather than capacity saturation.