Expanding the Science of Resilience: Conserving Resources in the Aid of Adaptation.
Expanding the Science of Resilience: Conserving Resources in the Aid of Adaptation.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/1047840x.2015.1002377
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
9.3
通讯作者：
Zalta AK
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hobfoll SE;Stevens NR;Zalta AK
在考虑压力的弹性时，有几个关键的组织原则将有助于研究和理解。理解弹性对于阐明压力过程至关重要，无论是出于研究，政策还是干预的目的。Bonanno，Romero和Klein（本期）提供了对弹性思维的极好回顾，并描述了需要未来关注的几个关键焦点。特别是，Bonanno et al. (this问题）通过概述弹性的时间要素来帮助研究和理解弹性。他们还富有洞察力地将复原力的重点从个人层面推向家庭和社区层面。在他们的论文中，他们指出，他们的“基本方法提供了一个现成的框架，将心理弹性的各种含义整合到一个单一的展开过程中。”我们认为可以进一步指导这一领域的是引入几个关键结构，这些结构有助于描述关于弹性的关键组织原则，这些原则映射出表征弹性的关键结构和过程。需要说明的是，这些概念中的许多概念已经在Bonanno关于弹性的开创性工作中以某种形式进行了讨论（Bonanno，2004; 2005; Bonanno，Galea，Bucciarelli，& Vlahov，2006; Bonanno，Brewin，Kaniasty & La Greca，2010），或者通过仔细考虑他的思想和弹性研究而受到我们的启发（Hobfoll，2011）。然而，我们认为我们已经挖掘、提炼和抛光了一些想法，这些想法可能会进一步为该领域做出贡献。加上Bonanno等人的贡献。(this问题），这些可能有助于提高关于承受重大和创伤性压力源以及在面临重大和创伤性压力源时恢复的知识。
In considering resilience to stress there are several key organizing principles that will aid both research and understanding. Understanding resilience is critical to illumination of the stress process, be it for purposes of research, policy, or intervention. Bonanno, Romero, and Klein (this issue) provide an excellent review of thinking on resilience and delineate several key foci that require future attention. In particular, Bonanno et al.(this issue) aid the study and understanding of resilience by outlining the temporal elements of resilience. They also insightfully push the focus of resilience beyond just the individual level, to the level of the family and community. In their paper, they state that their “elemental approach provides a ready framework for integrating the various meanings of psychological resilience into a single unfolding process.” What we think can further guide this field is the introduction of several key constructs that help describe key organizing principles about resilience that map out the critical constructs and processes that characterize resilience. To be clear, many of these concepts have been discussed in some form by Bonanno in his seminal work on resilience (Bonanno, 2004; 2005; Bonanno, Galea, Bucciarelli, & Vlahov, 2006; Bonanno, Brewin, Kaniasty & La Greca, 2010), or have been spurred on our part by considering his thoughts and studies of resilience carefully (Hobfoll, 2011). However, we think we have mined, refined, and polished some of the ideas in a way that may further contribute to the field. Together with the contributions of Bonanno et al.(this issue), these might aid the advancement of knowledge on withstanding major and traumatic stressors and recovery in the face of major and traumatic stressors.