Pluralizing energy justice: Incorporating feminist, anti-racist, Indigenous, and postcolonial perspectives
Pluralizing energy justice: Incorporating feminist, anti-racist, Indigenous, and postcolonial perspectives
复制标题
多元化能源正义：融合女权主义、反种族主义、原住民和后殖民观点
DOI：
10.1016/j.erss.2023.102996
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Firestone
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Sovacool;S. Bell;Cara Daggett;C. Labuski;Myles Lennon;L. Naylor;Julie Klinger;K. Leonard;J. Firestone
正义不仅代表着一种道德义务，而且可以增强快速推动全球脱碳的合法性和接受度。技术创新，即使是那些面向可持续性的技术创新，也可能在人口之间加强和引入新的不平等和差距，同时也会使环境退化永久化。能源正义的概念已经成为一个概念，方法和经验的工具，以突出和补救许多这些问题，强调什么是道德上公正或正确的。但是，这一学术体系的大部分内容都未能充分解释性别、印第安人、种族和其他交叉不平等。女权主义、本土主义、反种族主义和后殖民主义的正义观为带有殖民主义、自由主义、多数主义、功利主义或男性主义假设的正义理论提供了重要的补救。我们的观点是基于这四个核心，但往往被误解，甚至激进，司法方法。我们首先提供了这些方法的概述，然后将它们合成为一组主题，原则和问题，这可以指导未来的能源正义研究和实践。
Justice represents not only a moral obligation but can enhance the legitimacy and acceptance of a rapid push toward global decarbonization. Innovations in technology, even those geared toward sustainability, can both reinforce and introduce new inequalities and disparities across populations, while also perpetuating environmental degradation. The concept of energy justice has emerged as a conceptual, methodological, and empirical tool to both highlight and remediate many of these concerns, with an emphasis on what is morally just or right. But much of this body of scholarship fails to adequately account for gender, Indigeneity, race, and other intersecting inequalities. Feminist, Indigenous, anti-racist and postcolonial approaches to justice offer an important remedy to theories of justice with underlying colonial, liberalist, majoritarian, utilitarian, or masculinist assumptions. Our Perspective is grounded in these four core, but often misperceived or even radical, approaches to justice. We first provide an overview of each of these approaches and then synthesize them into a set of themes, principles, and questions, which can guide future energy justice research and practice.