Comparative study of kala-azar vector control measures in eastern Nepal
Comparative study of kala-azar vector control measures in eastern Nepal
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.10.012
复制
发表时间：
2010-02-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Boelaert, M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Das, M. L.;Roy, L.;Boelaert, M.
本研究旨在探索室内滞留喷洒(IRS)、长效杀虫网(LLINs)和生态媒介管理(EVM)之间最有效的媒介控制工具，作为区域内脏利什曼病消除行动的一部分。干预措施为氯氰菊酯为红外光谱，Permanet(R)为LLIN，以石灰为EVM粉刷房屋内墙。使用CDC微型灯光诱捕器(LT)和口腔吸引器，在所有武器中进行了一次基线和三次后续昆虫学调查。对干预组和对照组进行干预前和干预后媒介密度的比较。与吸引法相比，光诱法对白头翁的采集效率更高。两个IRS组的媒介密度均显著较低(在LT和p=0.009
This study was conducted to explore the most effective vector control tool among indoor residual spraying (IRS), long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and ecological vector management (EVM) as a part of the regional visceral leishmaniasis elimination initiative. Alpha-cypermethrin as IRS, PermaNet (R) as LLINs and plastering the inner walls of houses with lime as EVM were the interventions. One baseline and three follow-up entomological surveys were carried out in all arms using CDC miniature light traps (LT) and mouth aspirators. Comparisons were made between intervention arms and control arms with pre-intervention and post-intervention vector densities. Light traps were found more efficient in the collection of Phlebotomus argentipes in comparison with aspiration. Vector densities were significantly low in both IRS arm (p=0.009 in LT and p