Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM) National Campaign II

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM) National Campaign II
复制标题

无人机系统 (UAS) 交通管理 (UTM) 全国战役 II

DOI:
10.2514/6.2018-1727
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
0.4
通讯作者:
C. Mohlenbrink
C. Mohlenbrink
中科院分区:
物理与天体物理4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Arwa S. Aweiss;Brandon Owens;J. Rios;J. Homola;C. Mohlenbrink

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

NASA的无人机系统(UAS)交通管理(UTM)工作旨在使小型UAS能够进入低空空域。这一目标正在通过NASA与UAS利益相关者社区、FAA、其他政府机构和指定的FAA UAS测试站点建立的伙伴关系来实现。通过与美国联邦航空局的UAS测试基地合作,NASA的UTM项目在六个州的地点进行了地理上多样化的同时UAS操作。演示使用了NASA与FAA合作开发的架构,以安全地协调此类操作。这些演示-第二次或“技术能力水平(TCL 2)”全国UTM测试活动-于2017年5月15日至6月9日进行。测试期间,在阿拉斯加、内华达州、德克萨斯州、北达科他州、弗吉尼亚州和纽约的站点进行了多项UAS操作,多个组织根据NASA提供的规范担任UAS服务供应商和/或UAS运营商。通过让UAS社区的各个成员参与开发和运营角色,该活动提供了对UTM概念不同方面的初步验证,包括:UAS服务供应商技术和程序;地理围栏技术/一致性监测;地基监视/感知和规避;空中感知和规避;通信,导航,监视;以及与UTM数据创建和显示相关的人为因素。此外,还根据飞行数据定义和计算了性能指标,以便为比较飞行试验活动建立定量基础,并提供可能在未来的作战UTM系统中进行例行监测的潜在指标。
The Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM) effort at NASA aims to enable access to low-altitude airspace for small UAS. This goal is being pursued partly through partnerships that NASA has developed with the UAS stakeholder community, the FAA, other government agencies, and the designated FAA UAS Test Sites. By partnering with the FAA UAS Test Sites, NASA’s UTM project has performed a geographically diverse, simultaneous set of UAS operations at locations in six states. The demonstrations used an architecture that was developed by NASA in partnership with the FAA to safely coordinate such operations. These demonstrations—the second or “Technical Capability Level (TCL 2)” National Campaign of UTM testing—was performed from May 15 through June 9, 2017. Multiple UAS operations occurred during the testing at sites located in Alaska, Nevada, Texas, North Dakota, Virginia, and New York with multiple organizations serving as UAS Service Suppliers and/or UAS Operators per the specifications provided by NASA. By engaging various members of the UAS community in development and operational roles, this campaign provided initial validation of different aspects of the UTM concept including: UAS Service Supplier technologies and procedures; geofencing technologies/conformance monitoring; ground-based surveillance/sense and avoid; airborne sense and avoid; communication, navigation, surveillance; and human factors related to UTM data creation and display. Additionally, measures of performance were defined and calculated from the flight data to establish quantitative bases for comparing flight test activities and to provide potential metrics that might be routinely monitored in future operational UTM systems.