Social Funds: Assessing Effectiveness
Social Funds: Assessing Effectiveness
复制标题
社会基金：评估有效性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Svenja Andrea Weber
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Soniya Carvalho;Gillian M. Perkins;Howard White;Caroline Bahnson;Anju Gupta Kapoor;Svenja Andrea Weber
这项研究是牛津英语词典首次对社会基金项目进行独立评估。它审查了社会基金项目的发展成效，并得出了世行今后对这些项目的支持的启示。它回应了世界银行执行董事会对这一快速扩张的投资组合进行独立评估的兴趣。审查基于对现有数据和文献的审查，并提供了与社会基金项目的参与进程及其在政府、非政府和社区层面的机构发展影响有关的新信息。报告发现，社会基金项目在提供小规模基础设施方面非常有效，但在成果和福利影响方面取得持续的积极和显著改善方面就差得多了。虽然社会基金项目向穷人和最贫穷者提供的福利略高于比例，但也有相当数量的非穷人受益者。大多数社会基金受益人对所资助的次级项目感到满意，但最大的社区问题不一定得到解决，也不能保证选定的次级项目确保给社区带来最高的净收益。
This study is the first independent evaluation of social fund projects by OED. It reviews the development effectiveness of social fund projects and draws implications for future Bank support to them. It responds to the interest of the World Bank's Board of Executive Directors for an independent evaluation of this fast-expanding portfolio. The review is based on an examination of existing data and literature, and brings to bear new information relating to the participatory process in social fund projects and their institutional development impacts at the government, nongovernment, and community levels. The report finds that social fund projects have been highly effective in delivering small-scale infrastructure, but much less so in achieving consistently positive and significant improvements in outcomes and welfare impacts. While social fund projects have delivered slightly more than proportional benefits to the poor and the poorest, there have also been a significant number of non-poor beneficiaries. Most social fund beneficiaries are satisfied with the financed subprojects, but the greatest community problems have not necessarily been addressed and there is no assurance that the selected subprojects ensure the highest net benefits to the community.