Driving scenarios and environmental settings in simulator-based driving assessment systems for stroke: a systematic review
Driving scenarios and environmental settings in simulator-based driving assessment systems for stroke: a systematic review
复制标题
基于模拟器的中风驾驶评估系统中的驾驶场景和环境设置：系统评价
DOI：
10.1080/10749357.2023.2165273
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Piyapat Dajpratham
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gunt Chanmas;Pittawat Taveekitworachai;Pujana Paliyawan;Ramita Thawonmas;Ruck Thawonmas;Chakarida Nukoolkit;Piyapat Dajpratham
背景驾驶模拟器是评估中风患者驾驶能力的有效工具。他们可以引入各种驾驶场景，这对评估人员和驾驶员都大有裨益。然而，目前还没有关于在驾驶评估中引入驾驶场景的指南。目的我们进行了系统评价，以检查驾驶场景和环境在脑卒中患者基于模拟器的驾驶评估中的利用情况。方法按照 PRISMA 进行系统评价。我们于 2022 年 1 月和 6 月检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、ScienceDirect、ACM Digital Library 和 IEEE Xplore Digital Library 数据库，以识别自 2010 年以来发表的符合条件的文章。结果我们的搜索识别出 1,614 篇文章。我们纳入了 12 项应用驾驶模拟器来评估中风患者驾驶表现的研究。根据一定的驾驶能力，驾驶场景分为三类：车辆控制场景、危险感知场景和轨迹规划场景。最常见的驾驶场景是简单导航（n= 8）和紧急停车（n= 8）。最常用的驾驶区域是城市（n= 9），纳入的研究发现了各种道路和交通状况。只有2项研究应用了天气条件，例如晴朗晴朗条件或有风条件。结论建议未来的研究考虑覆盖上述三类场景，并进一步研究在驾驶评估中引入复杂天气条件和局部交通条件的好处。
BackgroundDriving simulators are effective tools to evaluate the driving abilities of patients with stroke. They can introduce various driving scenarios which will greatly benefit both the assessors and drivers. However, there is still no guidelines by which driving scenarios should be introduced in the driving assessment.ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review to examine the utilization of driving scenarios and environments in the simulator-based driving assessment for patients with stroke.MethodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library databases in January and June 2022 to identify eligible articles published since 2010.ResultsOur searches identified 1,614 articles. We included 12 studies that applied driving simulators to assess the driving performance of patients with stroke. The driving scenarios were categorized into three categories – vehicle controls scenarios, hazard perception scenarios, and trajectory planning scenarios – based on a certain set of driving abilities. The most common driving scenarios are simple navigation (n= 8) and emergency stop (n= 8). The most frequently used driving area is urban (n= 9), and a variety of roads and traffic conditions were found in the included studies. Only 2 studies applied weather conditions, such as the clear and sunny condition or the windy condition.ConclusionIt is recommended for future research to consider covering scenarios from the aforementioned three categories and further investigate the benefits of introducing complex weather conditions and localized traffic conditions in the driving assessment.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Page MJ;McKenzie JE;Bossuyt PM;Boutron I;Hoffmann TC;Mulrow CD;Shamseer L;Tetzlaff JM;Akl EA;Brennan SE;Chou R;Glanville J;Grimshaw JM;Hróbjartsson A;Lalu MM;Li T;Loder EW;Mayo-Wilson E;McDonald S;McGuinness LA;Stewart LA;Thomas J;Tricco AC;Welch VA;Whiting P;Moher D
通讯作者：
Moher D
低成本赛车模拟器在中风后驾驶评估中的可行性和有效性
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Jonathan Tiu;Annie C. Harmon;James D. Stowe;Amen Zwa;Marc Kinnear;L. Dimitrov;Tina Nolte;D. Carr
通讯作者：
D. Carr
DOI：
10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.010
发表时间：
2014-09-01
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Lim, Phui Cheng;Sheppard, Elizabeth;Crundall, David
通讯作者：
Crundall, David
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Spreij LA;Ten Brink AF;Visser-Meily JMA;Nijboer TCW
通讯作者：
Nijboer TCW
老年脑卒中患者的抑郁、日常生活活动和生活质量。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
HVM Bioflux
影响因子：
--
作者：
R. Oros;C. A. Popescu;S. Iova;P. Mihancea;C. Iova
通讯作者：
C. Iova