Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate: A comparison with Eurocleft
Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate: A comparison with Eurocleft
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jcms.2007.04.011
复制
发表时间：
2007-09-01
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Katsaros, Christos
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nollet, Pieter J. P. M.;Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie;Katsaros, Christos
目的：评估在奈梅亨接受 UCLAP 治疗的患者的鼻唇部外观，并将其与来自 Eurocleft 研究的其他六个单独中心的患者进行比较。还调查了鼻唇沟美观、牙弓关系和出生时裂隙宽度之间的关系。患者：来自荷兰奈梅亨腭裂科的患有完全 UCLAP 的白种人儿童（n = 42 连续病例）。方法：通过应用美学指数来评估鼻唇沟外观，然后与六中心 Eurocleft 研究进行比较。出生时在上颌石膏模型上测量裂隙宽度。结果：42 名奈梅亨患者的整体美观评分的 90% 中心范围为 2.0-3.7，评分范围为 1 至 5（1 = 鼻唇沟外观非常好，5 = 鼻唇沟外观非常差）。就整体美观评分而言，奈梅亨表现出与 Eurocleft 中心 A、D、E 和 F 相似的治疗结果。奈梅亨的评分显着优于 Eurocleft 中心 C，显着低于 Eurocleft 中心 B (p
Objective: To evaluate nasolabial appearance of patients with UCLAP treated in Nijmegen and to compare them with those from six other individual centers from the Eurocleft study. Relationships between nasolabial aesthetics, dental arch relationships and cleft width at birth were also investigated. Patients: Children of Caucasian origin with complete UCLAP (n = 42 consecutive cases) from the Nijmegen Cleft Palate Unit, The Netherlands. Methods: Nasolabial appearance was assessed by applying an aesthetic index and subsequently compared with the six-centre Eurocleft study. Cleft width at birth was measured on maxillary plaster casts. Results: The 90% central range for the overall aesthetic rating of the 42 Nijmegen patients is 2.0-3.7 on a scale from I to 5 (1 = very good nasolabial appearance, 5 = very poor nasolabial appearance). With regard to the overall aesthetic rating, Nijmegen showed similar treatment outcomes with Eurocleft centres A, D, E and F. Nijmegen scored significantly better than Eurocleft centre C and significantly worse than Eurocleft centre B (p