Nonexpert ratings of family and parent-child interaction.
Nonexpert ratings of family and parent-child interaction.
复制标题
对家庭和亲子互动的非专家评级。
DOI：
10.1037/a0021275
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Brewster,Ryan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baker,JasonK;Messinger,DanielS;Ekas,NaomiV;Lindahl,KristinM;Brewster,Ryan
观察方法有利于研究家庭过程，但许多专家评级系统是昂贵和耗时的。本研究探讨了使用八到十个非专家小组来评估家庭冲突和母亲敏感性的实用性。39个家庭的三元互动录像来自Lindahl（1998），22个母亲-幼儿自由玩耍互动来自Baker，Messinger，里昂和Grantz（2010）。60名大学生使用计算机辅助技术对这些样本中的互动进行了真实的评价。家庭冲突的非专家评级是可靠的，与专家评级高度一致，并复制了Lindahl（1998）的关键发现。母亲敏感性的非专家评级复制了Baker，Messinger等人的相关发现。（2010年）。然而，母亲敏感性的一致性较低，这是因为与情感上的谨慎相比，非专家倾向于过度关注敏感的结构。第二项研究表明，只有6名非专家可以有效地评价母亲的敏感结构，但非专家无法准确地评价情感的敏感性。这些重要的家庭结构的研究方法和我们的理解的影响进行了讨论。
Observational methods benefit the study of family process, but many expert rating systems are costly and time-consuming. This study examined the utility of using small groups of eight to ten nonexperts to rate family conflict and maternal sensitivity. Videotaped triadic interactions of 39 families were drawn from Lindahl (1998), and 22 mother–toddler free-play interactions were drawn from Baker, Messinger, Lyons, and Grantz (2010). Sixty undergraduates rated interactions from these samples in real time using computer-assisted technology. Nonexpert ratings of family conflict were reliable, demonstrated high concordance with expert ratings, and replicated a key finding from Lindahl (1998). Nonexpert ratings of maternal sensitivity replicated a relevant finding from Baker, Messinger et al.(2010). Concordance was lower for maternal sensitivity, however, because of the tendency of nonexperts to overattend to sensitive structuring compared with emotional supportiveness. A second study indicated that as few as six nonexperts could effectively rate maternal sensitive structuring, but that nonexperts were unable to accurately rate emotional supportiveness. Implications for research methods and for our understanding of these important family constructs are discussed.