Reliability of the "Draw-a-Man" test.
Reliability of the "Draw-a-Man" test.
复制标题
“画人”测试的可靠性。
DOI：
10.1080/0013188750180104
复制
发表时间：
1975
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
P. Williams
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Evans;Neil M. Ferguson;P. Davies;P. Williams
总结本文中报告的研究旨在检查用于五岁入学者的古迪纳夫“画一个人”测试的哈里斯修订版的三个可靠性特征。该测试在两个场合分别对90名儿童进行了测试，平均时间间隔为两周。三人负责图纸的管理和评分，调查检查了与i）时间稳定性（同一测试人员）; ii）时间稳定性（不同测试人员）; iii）标记错误相关的可靠性系数。结果表明，当使用有经验的测试人员时，“画一个人”量表的可靠性与以前以年龄较大的儿童为受试者的研究报告的可靠性相同。它还建议，与学校入学，不同的培训测试人员的影响，最后的排名顺序的分数可能是相当小的。目前的研究也表明，与五岁儿童的绘画有少...
Summary The study reported in this paper was designed to examine three reliability characteristics of the Harris revision of the Goodenough ‘Draw‐a‐man’ Test when used with five‐year‐old school entrants. The test was individually administered to each of 90 children on two occasions, with an average time‐separation of two weeks. Three persons undertook the administration and scoring of the drawings, and the investigation examined the reliability coefficients associated with i) temporal stability (same tester); ii) temporal stability (different testers); iii) marker error. The results indicate that when experienced testers are used, the reliability of the ‘Draw‐a‐man’ scale is of the same magnitude as that reported in previous studies involving older children as subjects. It is also suggested that with school entrants, the influence of different trained testers on the final rank order of scores is probably quite small. The present study shows too, that with the drawings of five‐year‐old children there is le...