Relationships between Cloninger's, Zuckerman's, and Eysenck's dimensions of personality.
Relationships between Cloninger's, Zuckerman's, and Eysenck's dimensions of personality.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0191-8869(96)00042-6
复制
发表时间：
1996-08
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
M. Zuckerman;C. Cloninger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Zuckerman;C. Cloninger
Cloninger（1987）、Cloninger、Svrakic和Przybeck（1993）、Eysenck（1967）和Zuckerman（1983、1984、1991）的人格系统都是基于人格的心理生物学模型。Cloninger和Zuckerman都将单胺类神经递质系统作为基本人格特质的基础，尽管他们在特定单胺类神经递质与人格特质之间的关系以及这种关系的相对特异性方面存在差异（Zuckerman, 1995）。这三位理论家都设计了问卷来评估他们所认为的人格或气质的基本维度。量表之间的精确关系是一个有趣的问题，不仅要知道表型表征或特征的可比性，而且要比较用各种工具进行的研究结果。Zuckerman, Kuhlman, Joireman， Teta和Kraft（1993）比较了三种人格结构模型，Costa和mcrae（1992）的“大五”，Eysenck（1967）的“大三”，以及他们自己的“另类五”。外向性和神经质因素在三个系统中都是高度相关的。Zuckerman等人的冲动感觉寻求和攻击-敌意因素与Costa和mcrae的大五人格中的尽责性和宜人性以及艾森克的P维度表现出中等高度的关系。有些维度，如Zuckerman等人的“活动”，Costa和麦克雷的“经验开放性”，对于他们的特定系统来说是独一无二的，或者被纳入其他系统的主要维度。
The personality systems of Cloninger (1987), Cloninger, Svrakic and Przybeck (1993), Eysenck (1967), and Zuckerman (1983, 1984, 1991) are all based on psychobiological models of personality. Cloninger and Zuckerman both focus on monoamine neurotransmitter systems as the bases for fundamental personality traits, although they differ on the relationships between particular monoamines and personality traits and in the relative specificity of the relationships (Zuckerman, 1995). All three theorists developed questionnaires to assess what they regard as the basic dimensions of personality or temperament. The precise relationships between the scales in the inventories is a matter of interest not only to know the comparability of the phenotypical representations or the traits, but also to compare the results of research being done with the various instruments.Zuckerman, Kuhlman, Joireman, Teta and Kraft (1993) compared three structural models for personality, Costa and McCrae’s (1992) big five, Eysenck’s (1967) big three, and their own “alternative five”. Extraversion and neuroticism factors were very highly related across all three systems. Zuckerman et al.’s Impulsive Sensation Seeking and Aggression-Hostility factors showed moderately high relationships with Conscientiousness and Agreeableness in Costa and McCrae’s big five and with Eysenck’s P dimension. Some dimensions such as Zuckerman et al.’s Activity and Costa and McCrae’s Openness to Experience were unique to their particular system or subsumed as facets of major dimensions in other systems.