Establishment of national norm of Cattell 16 personality factor questionnaire in military personnel
Establishment of national norm of Cattell 16 personality factor questionnaire in military personnel
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yang Guo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yang Guo
目的：检验卡特尔16种人格因素问卷(16PF)在军人中的信度和效度，并建立全国常模，分析军人在性别、工龄、军衔等方面的发展特点。方法：采用16PF对中国所在的30个省市的13450名军人进行测评。这些数据在性别、服役年限和军衔方面进行了比较。结果：1条目分析：各条目得分与总分的相关系数在0.410~0.691之间(P0.01)。2信效度分析：Cronbachα在0.511~0.829之间，分半信度在0.541~0.838之间，重复信度在0.553~0.842之间。总分与各因子分的相关系数为0.612~0.845，大部分因子分之间的相关系数为0.180~0.510。3成功编制了军人16PF的全国常模。4发展特征分析：与女性相比，男性在A，C，E，G，L，M，N，O，Q4，X1，Y2因子上得分明显升高，B，F，H，Q1，Q2，X4，Y1，Y3因子上除I，Q3，X2，X3，Y4因子外，其余因子得分均显著降低(P<0.05)，工龄间除E，G，X2因子外，其余各因子得分均有显著差异(P<0.05)。士兵、士官、军官在16PF中除E、L、M、Y2因子外，其余因子分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：16PF在军人中具有较好的差异性、信度和效度，军人人格在性别、工龄、军衔等方面具有明显的发展特点。
AIM: To test the reliability and validity of Cattell 16 personality factor questionnaire (16PF) in military personnel, and to make a national norm, and to analyze the developmental characteristics of military personnel in gender, service years and military rank. METHODS: 16PF was employed to evaluate 13450 military personnel in 30 provinces or cities of China. The data were compared in gender, service years and military rank. RESULTS: ① Item analysis: The correlation coefficients between each item score and the total score were in 0.410-0.691 (P0.01). ② Reliability and validity analysis: The Cronbach alpha was in 0.511-0.829, the split-half reliabilities were in 0.541-0.838, and the repeated reliabilities were 0.553-0.842. The correlation coefficients between total score and factor scores were 0.612-0.845, and the correlation coefficients among most factor scores were 0.180-0.510. ③ National norm of 16PF of military personnel was successfully made. ④ Developmental characteristics analysis: Compared with the female, the scores of the male increased obviously in factor A, C, E, G, L, M, N, O, Q4, X1 and Y2, and the scores decreased obviously in factor B, F, H, Q1, Q2, X4, Y1 and Y3(P0.05) other than factor I, Q3, X2, X3 and Y4(P0.05); there were obvious differences in factor scores among service years other than factor E, G and X2 (P0.05). Clear difference was found in factor scores other than factor E, L, M and Y2 of 16PF among soldiers, petty officers and officers (P0.05). CONCLUSION: 16PF in military personnel shows well differentiation, reliability and validity, and there are obvious developmental characteristics in gender, service year and military rank in personality of military personnel by 16PF.