The Institutional Embedding of Interactive Policy Making
The Institutional Embedding of Interactive Policy Making
复制标题
互动政策制定的制度嵌入
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. V. van Tatenhove
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Edelenbos;P. Klok;J. V. van Tatenhove
在这篇文章中，作者讨论了荷兰中央政府层面的公民参与。通过对三个政府部门的八个互动项目进行系统分析的比较研究，作者特别关注互动决策的非正式性质与正式的民主决策程序之间的关系。他们称之为“互动政策制定的制度化嵌入”。作者解决了这样一个问题：在确保互动政策制定对正式的民主决策产生持续影响方面，哪些形式的制度嵌入最有希望？为了回答这个问题，他们区分了三种不同的制度嵌入形式--即行政、政府和政治。比较研究表明，行政、政府和政治的多重制度嵌入确保了互动政策制定的持续效果。政治嵌入在制造足够的压力以很好地组织和管理互动进程并认真考虑结果方面尤其重要。
In this article, the authors address citizen involvement at the central government level in the Netherlands. Through comparative research in which they systematically analyze eight interactive projects in three governmental departments, the authors especially pay attention to the relation between the informal character of interactive policy making and formal democratic decision-making procedures. They call this the “institutional embedding of interactive policy making.” The authors address the question, which forms of institutional embedding are most promising in securing continued effect from interactive policy making on formal democratic decision making? To answer this question, they distinguish three different forms of institutional embedding—that is, administrative, governmental, and political. The comparative research shows that a multiple institutional embedding of administrative, governmental, and political secures the continued effect of interactive policy making. Political embedding is especially important in creating enough pressure to organize and manage interactive processes well and take outcomes seriously into account.