Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association?
Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association?
复制标题
公式序列和 L2 口语能力：目标语言的类型会影响关联吗？
DOI：
10.1515/iral.2011.017
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
June Eyckmans
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Stengers;F. Boers;Alex Housen;June Eyckmans
摘要本文调查了两种不同类型语言的中级学生在何种程度上有效地使用公式化序列，英语和西班牙语，与他们对这些语言的口语熟练程度有关。以前的研究（例如，Boers等人，Language Teaching Research 10：245-261，2006）已经表明，适当地使用公式化序列有助于英语学习者成为流利和地道的说话者。从本研究的证据，这是与荷兰语的英语和西班牙语的学生的参与，证实了这一发现，作为口语水平评估的基础上复述任务与公式化序列的学生在这些任务中使用的数量呈正相关。然而，在英语语言样本中，相关性最强。在我们的参与者的西班牙语口语中，形态屈折错误的发生率似乎更高，这抑制了使用公式化序列对他们口语水平的贡献（正如我们的评估员所认为的那样）。研究结果进行了讨论，参考L1和L2之间的类型差异。
Abstract This paper investigates the extent to which productive use of formulaic sequences by intermediate students of two typologically different languages, i.e., English and Spanish, is associated with their oral proficiency in these languages. Previous research (e.g., Boers et al., Language Teaching Research 10: 245–261, 2006) has shown that appropriate use of formulaic sequences helps learners of English come across as fluent and idiomatic speakers. The evidence from the present study, which was conducted with the participation of Dutch-speaking students of English and Spanish, confirms that finding, as oral proficiency assessments based on re-tell tasks correlated positively with the number of formulaic sequences the students used in these tasks. The correlations were strongest in the English language samples, however. It seems that the greater incidence of morphological-inflectional errors in our participants' spoken Spanish dampens the contribution that using formulaic sequences tends to make to their oral proficiency (as perceived by our assessors). The findings are discussed with reference to typological differences between L1 and L2.
注重形式：语言教学方法的设计特点
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1991
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Michael H. Long
通讯作者：
Michael H. Long