Passives are not hard to interpret but hard to remember: evidence from online and offline studies
Passives are not hard to interpret but hard to remember: evidence from online and offline studies
复制标题
被动语态并不难解释，但很难记住：来自线上和线下研究的证据
DOI：
10.1080/23273798.2019.1602733
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Santi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Paolazzi;Nino Grillo;A. Alexiadou;A. Santi
抽象被动句子比主动句子更难理解。以前的仅在线研究对此概括提出了怀疑。当前的论文直接比较钝化的在线和离线处理，并操纵动词类型：状态与事件。遗传的被动者暂时模棱两可（形容词与言语），意外的被动人物不是（总是语言）。在4个实验（带有理解问题的自定进度阅读）中，被动术的阅读速度始终比活跃者快。正如被动处理的主要观点（启发式，句法，频繁主义者）所论述的那样，这与说话很难解析和/或解释的说法相矛盾。阅读时间促进与更广泛的期望/惊人理论兼容。当理解针对的theta词分配时，不论动词类型如何，被动剂都会更加错误。口头WM测量与准确性差异相关，但在线措施无关。准确性效果被认为反映了与特定任务所要求保持/操纵被动表示相关的解释后难度。
ABSTRACT Passive sentences are considered more difficult to comprehend than active sentences. Previous online-only studies cast doubt on this generalisation. The current paper directly compares online and offline processing of passivization and manipulates verb type: state vs. event. Stative passives are temporarily ambiguous (adjectival vs. verbal), eventive passives are not (always verbal). Across 4 experiments (self-paced reading with comprehension questions), passives were consistently read faster than actives. This contradicts the claim that passives are difficult to parse and/or interpret, as argued by main perspectives of passive processing (heuristic, syntactic, frequentist). The reading time facilitation is compatible with broader expectation/surprisal theories. When comprehension targeted theta-role assignment, passives were more errorful, regardless of verb type. Verbal WM measures correlated with the difference in accuracy, but not online measures. The accuracy effect is argued to reflect a post-interpretive difficulty associated with maintaining/manipulating the passive representation as required by specific tasks.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
DeDe, G;Caplan, D;Waters, G
通讯作者：
Waters, G
工作记忆在句法歧义解决中的作用：心理测量方法。
DOI：
10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.64
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. General
影响因子：
--
作者：
Swets,Benjamin;Desmet,Timothy;Hambrick,DavidZ;Ferreira,Fernanda
通讯作者：
Ferreira,Fernanda
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
通讯作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Barr, Dale J.;Levy, Roger;Scheepers, Christoph;Tily, Harry J.
通讯作者：
Tily, Harry J.