Argumentation structures in legal dossiers
Argumentation structures in legal dossiers
复制标题
法律卷宗中的论证结构
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Prakken
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jobien Sombekke;T. V. Engers;H. Prakken
本文认为，在不久的将来，在实践中利用人工智能和法律模型进行法律论证的最佳机会可能是设计法律论证管理系统。此类系统没有知识库和推理引擎，但允许用户根据案件的论证结构构建法律案件档案，以便更好地对档案进行概述，并更好地检索、比较和起草文件。为了深入了解如何设计这样的系统，提出了一个案例研究，其中根据其论证结构分析了荷兰民事纠纷中代表客户的律师的档案。使用Araucaria软件工具将生成的结构可视化。特别关注的是在争议过程中随着时间的推移而产生的辩论结构，以及律师使用的辩论策略和策略。
This paper argues that the best chance of utilising AI & Law models of legal argument in practice in the near future may be in desiging legal argumentation management systems. Such systems do not have a knowledge base and inference engine but allow the user to structure a legal case dossier in terms of the argumentation structure of a case, so that better overview over the dossier is obtained and documents can be better retrieved, compared and drafted. To obtain insight in how such systems should be designed, a case study is presented in which a dossier of a solicitor representing a client in a Dutch civil dispute is analysed according to its argumentation structure. The resulting structures are visualised using the Araucaria software tool. Special attention is paid to the creation of the argumentation structure over time in the course of the dispute, and to the argumentative tactics and strategies employed by the solicitor.