Dynamic Stretching and Golf Swing Performance
Dynamic Stretching and Golf Swing Performance
复制标题
DOI：
10.1055/s-0028-1103303
复制
发表时间：
2009-02-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Wallace, E. S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Moran, K. A.;McGrath, T.;Wallace, E. S.
本研究的目的是研究动态拉伸，静态拉伸和没有拉伸，作为一般热身的一部分，对高尔夫挥杆性能与五铁的影响。在拉伸后0 min、5 min、15 min和30 min进行性能测量。动态拉伸产生的杆头速度显着高于静态拉伸（Delta = 1.9m.s（-1）; p=0.000）和无拉伸（Delta=1.7m.s（-1）; p=0.000），并且球速高于静态拉伸（Delta=3.5m.s（-1）; p=0.003）和无拉伸（Delta=3.3m.s（-1）; p=0.001）。动态拉伸产生的摆动路径比静态拉伸（Delta = -0.61度，p = 0.000）和无拉伸（Delta=-0.72度，p=0.01）显著更直。动态拉伸也比静态拉伸产生更多的中心撞击点（Delta=0.7cm，p=0.001）。对于杆面角度，拉伸或时间都没有影响。对于测量的所有变量，静态拉伸和无拉伸条件之间没有显著差异。所有结果均不受拉伸后测量时间的影响。结果表明，动态拉伸应作为一般热身的一部分，在高尔夫球。
The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of dynamic stretching, static stretching and no stretching, as part of a general warm-up, on golf swing performance with a five-iron. Measures of performance were taken 0 min, 5 min, 15 min and 30 min after stretching. Dynamic stretching produced significantly greater club head speeds than both static stretching (Delta = 1.9m.s(-1); p=0.000) and no stretching (Delta=1.7m.s(-1); p=0.000), and greater ball speeds than both static stretching (Delta=3.5m.s(-1); p=0.003) and no stretching (Delta=3.3m.s(-1); p=0.001). Dynamic stretching produced significantly straighter swing-paths than both static stretching (Delta = -0.61 degrees, p = 0.000) and no stretching (Delta=-0.72 degrees, p=0.01). Dynamic stretching also produced more central impact points than the static stretch (Delta=0.7cm, p=0.001). For the club face angle, there was no effect of either stretch or time. For all of the variables measured, there was no significant difference between the static stretch and no stretch conditions. All of the results were unaffected by the time of measurement after stretching. The results indicate that dynamic stretching should be used as part of a general warm-up in golf.