Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions.
Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions.
复制标题
程序正义作为分配决策的标准。
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.296
复制
发表时间：
1986
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
T. Tyler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Edith Barrett;T. Tyler
336名大学生考虑了16种具有代表性的人际关系类型中的分配，这些类型的人际关系在社会情绪或任务基础、合作或竞争互动方式、因果或规则导向行为以及权力分配方面存在差异。SS还评价了8个分配标准的重要性，如客观性和实用性，以及6个判断程序公平的标准，如一致性和可改正性。结果表明，在有关资源分配的决定中，程序公平是一个比各种不公平标准更重要的标准，而且在重要性上与分配公平同等重要。探讨了程序正义在分配中的意义以及程序正义与社会分配目标的关系。(参考文献41)(心理信息数据库记录(C)2016《行政程序法》，保留所有权利)
336 undergraduates considered allocations made within 16 representative types of interpersonal relationships that varied with regard to social-emotional or task basis, cooperative or competitive style of interaction, causal or rule-directed behavior, and power distribution. Ss also rated the importance of 8 allocation criteria, such as objectivity and practicality, and of 6 criteria for judging procedural fairness, such as consistency and correctability. Results suggest that procedural justice was a more important criterion in decisions concerning resource allocations than were a variety of nonfairness criteria and that it was equal in importance to distributive justice. The meaning of procedural justice in allocations and the relation of procedural justice concerns to social allocation goals are explored.(41 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)