On the Spatiality of Institutions and Knowledge
On the Spatiality of Institutions and Knowledge
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_1
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Johannes Glückler;R. Suddaby;Regina Lenz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Johannes Glückler;R. Suddaby;Regina Lenz
地理与知识的创造、使用和再生产之间的关系是本书系列的核心。前12卷集中在其他主题中，创造力的作用，（Meusburger，Funke和Wunder，2009年），科学和大学（Meusburger，利文斯顿，& Jöns，2010），功率（Meusburger，Gregory和Suarsana，2015年），文化和行动（Meusburger，Werlen，& Suarsana，2017）和网络（Glückler，Lazega，& Hammer，2017）在培养对认知的社会过程如何在空间中展开的理解方面发挥了重要作用。他们都提请注意这一过程是如何定位在地方和学习如何连接各地的人。以机构为中心，第13卷提出了人类知识空间性的另一个视角。在社会科学领域，学者们一直认为制度在社会、政治、文化和经济发展中发挥着重要作用。虽然人们对制度的重要性有着一致的看法，但对于什么是制度以及制度如何影响社会生活，人们有着几种理解。本书的目的是研究制度理论中一个相当被忽视、最近才被承认的维度：制度的空间性、制度变迁的时空动态、制度在有限领土内知识的创造和再生产以及相关社会成果中的作用。在这篇导言中，我们希望激发关于社会科学中各个学科之间机构的空间性和动态性的对话。我们首先简要介绍了
The relationship between geography and the creation, use, and reproduction of knowledge has been at the core of this book series. The previous twelve volumes have focused, among other topics, on the role that creativity (Meusburger, Funke, & Wunder, 2009), science and universities (Meusburger, Livingston, & Jöns, 2010), power (Meusburger, Gregory, & Suarsana, 2015), culture and action (Meusburger, Werlen, & Suarsana, 2017), and networks (Glückler, Lazega, & Hammer, 2017) have in cultivating an understanding of how the social process of knowing unfolds in space. They all draw attention to ways in which this process is situated in places and how learning connects people across places. Centering on institutions, volume 13 presents yet another perspective on the spatiality of human knowledge. Across the social sciences scholars have been attributing to institutions a major part in social, political, cultural, an d economic development. Although there is agreement on the importance of institutions, there are several understandings of what institutions are and how they influence social life. The purpose of this volume is to examine a rather neglected and only recently acknowledged dimension in institutional theory: the spatiality of institutions, the spatiotemporal dynamics of institutional change, and the role of institutions in the creation and reproduction of knowledge and related social outcomes in bounded territories. In this introduction we wish to stimulate a dialogue on the spatiality and dynamics of institutions across the boundaries of individual disciplines in the social sciences. We open the floor to such dialogue by briefly highlighting achievements of