INTERGENERATIONAL HELP AND PUBLIC ASSISTANCE IN EUROPE A case of specialization?
INTERGENERATIONAL HELP AND PUBLIC ASSISTANCE IN EUROPE A case of specialization?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/14616696.2012.726733
复制
发表时间：
2013-02-01
影响因子：
8.1
通讯作者：
Brandt, Martina
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brandt, Martina
根据欧洲健康、老龄化和退休情况调查（SHARE）对代际支助模式进行的比较分析显示，私人支助模式的地理分布情况不同：在北方欧洲，父母和子女之间的帮助非常普遍，但通常不费时间。南欧的情况正好相反，在那里，极少数人的支持关系在时间上非常紧张。中西欧介于两者之间，具有平均转移率和强度。使用多层次模型，这些不同的支持模式可以解释为根据专业化假设的公共援助的普及：随着公共转移和社会服务的增加，零星的帮助更有可能（挤入），代与代之间的支持时间更少（挤出）。因此，在北方，大多数支助是自愿提供的，而在欧洲大陆和地中海国家，支助往往被视为义务性的。
The comparative analysis of intergenerational support patterns based on SHARE, the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe, with about 30,000 respondents from 11 European countries reveals a distinct geographical distribution of private support patterns: in Northern Europe help between parents and children is very common, but typically little time-consuming. The contrary is true for Southern Europe, where comparably few support relations are very intense in terms of time. Central Western Europe lies in-between with average transfer rates and intensities. Using multilevel modeling, these different support patterns can be explained by the prevalence of public assistance according to the specialization hypothesis: with increased public transfers and social services, sporadic help is more likely (crowding in), and less time consuming support between generations (crowding out) occurs. Accordingly, most support is provided voluntarily in Northern Europe, whereas it is more often perceived as obligatory in Continental and Mediterranean countries.