UNSC Resolution 1325 national action plans in Liberia and Sierra Leone: An analysis of gendered power relations in hybrid peacebuilding
UNSC Resolution 1325 national action plans in Liberia and Sierra Leone: An analysis of gendered power relations in hybrid peacebuilding
复制标题
联合国安理会第 1325 号决议利比里亚和塞拉利昂国家行动计划：混合建设和平中的性别权力关系分析
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Helen S. A. Basini
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Caitlin Ryan;Helen S. A. Basini
摘要本文探讨了在建设和平的文献中使用“混杂”是如何忽视混杂互动的性别维度的。它通过审查联合国安全理事会第1325号决议为利比里亚和塞拉利昂制定的国家行动计划来开展这项工作。通过问“谁参与”的性别问题？以及“他们如何参与”它借鉴了麦金蒂的混杂概念，并追溯了混杂和平中的顺从和激励力量，以及当地行动者抵制和提供替代方案的能力。然而，麦金蒂的模型被认为是不够的，因为它没有注意到权力的性别性质。研究发现，采用考虑到性别因素的混合办法，可以更容易地追踪国家行动方案在冲突后国家的混合进程，因为这些国家的行动方案的执行受到限制。在问“谁”和“如何”的问题，混合建设和平的性别性质得出三个结论：国际干预依赖于“女性化”的地方行为者;在“男性”的领域内框定的问题更有可能得到关注;和第1325号决议的议程在冲突后国家可以通过将其框定为一个“软”的问题被颠覆。
ABSTRACT This paper considers how the use of ‘hybridity’ in the peacebuilding literature overlooks the gendered dimensions of hybrid interactions. It does so by examining the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1325 national action plans (NAPs) for Liberia and Sierra Leone. By asking the gendered questions of ‘who participates?’ and ‘how do they participate?’ it draws from Mac Ginty’s conception of hybridity and traces the compliance and incentivizing power in hybridized peace, as well as the ability of local actors to resist and provide alternatives. However, Mac Ginty’s model is found to be inadequate because of its inattention to the gendered nature of power. It is found that with a gendered approach to hybridity, it is easier to trace the processes of hybridization of NAPs in post-conflict states where their implementation is limited. In asking the questions of ‘who’ and ‘how’, three conclusions about the gendered nature of hybrid peacebuilding are drawn: international intervention relies upon the ‘feminization’ of local actors; issues framed within the realm of the ‘masculine’ are more likely to get attention; and the Resolution 1325 agenda in post-conflict states can be subverted by framing it as a ‘soft’ issue.