Perceptions of scientific misconduct among graduate allied health students relative to ethics education and gender.
Perceptions of scientific misconduct among graduate allied health students relative to ethics education and gender.
复制标题
研究生联合健康学生对道德教育和性别方面的科学不端行为的看法。
作者：
L. Mundt
一项研究旨在确定伦理教育和性别对学生对科学不端行为的看法的影响。受试者是一所大学五个相关卫生职业专业的研究生，他们被要求完成一项由48个问题(二分法和利克特量表问题)组成的在线调查：36个问题评估了学生对科学不端行为(因变量)的看法，10个是人口统计学问题，2个是自由文本问题，要求澄清任何回答。在202名研究生中，72名学生(54名女性，17名男性)完成了调查。40名参与者(56%)至少参加过一门伦理课程，31名(44%)没有参加过任何伦理课程。根据卫生专业学生的调查结果计算出的科学诚信得分分析显示，上过伦理学课程的学生在研究中使用人类的程度上的得分明显高于没有上过伦理学课程的学生。参加过医学伦理学课程的学生在遗传学研究方面的得分明显高于参加过其他伦理学课程的学生。在研究中使用动物的问题上，女性的得分明显高于男性。
A study was conducted to determine the influence of ethics education and gender on students' perceptions of scientific misconduct. Subjects were graduate students from five allied health professions programs at a single university, who were asked to complete an online survey consisting of 48 questions (dichotomous and Likert-scale questions): 36 questions assessed the perceptions of students regarding the concerns of scientific misconduct (dependent variable), 10 were demographic questions, and 2 were free-text questions soliciting clarification of any responses. Out of 202 graduate students, 72 students (54 female, 17 male) completed the survey. Forty (56%) of the participants had taken at least one ethics course, while 31 (44%) had not taken any ethics courses. Analysis of Scientific Integrity Scores calculated from survey responses of health professions students revealed that students who had taken an ethics course scored significantly higher on the scale of the use of humans in research than students who had not taken an ethics course. Students who had taken medical ethics courses scored significantly higher on the scale regarding genetics research than students who had taken other ethics courses. Women scored significantly higher than men on the scale regarding the use of animals in research.