Prosodic Categories: Production, Perception and Comprehension
Prosodic Categories: Production, Perception and Comprehension
复制标题
韵律类别：产生、感知和理解
DOI：
10.1007/978-94-007-0137-3_2
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lahiri A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lahiri A
虚词倾向于将自身是语音词的词汇化。是否有偏好向左或向右的连接？这种音系化会导致递归的音位词吗？由两个语音词组成的简单复合词本身构成语音词吗？本文主要关注的是音节单位和韵律单位，并提供了共时分析、历时数据和心理语言学证据来支持扬抑音分组和向左依附。我们将首先提出一个简短的调查的语音和重音的过程上cliticized与复合式结构在英语，荷兰语，瑞典语，挪威语和孟加拉语。然后，我们提供心理语言学的证据表明，lavelets在语言规划和生产的语音词，这可能构成独立的词汇，功能词cliticized左，强调功能词，以及化合物的水平上运作。
Function words tend to cliticize onto lexical words which are themselves phonological words. Is there a preference for leftwards or rightwards attachment? Does this cliticization lead to recursive phonological words? Do simple compounds consisting of two phonological words constitute phonological words themselves? Grouping and prosodic units are our main concerns in this paper and we provide synchronic analyses, diachronic data and psycholinguistic evidence in support of trochaic grouping and leftwards attachment. We will first present a brief survey of phonological and accentual processes operating on cliticized versus compound-like constructions in English, Dutch, Swedish, Norwegian and Bengali. We then provide psycholinguistic evidence suggesting that the latencies in language planning and production operate on the level of phonological words which may constitute independent lexical words, function words cliticized leftwards, stressed function words, as well as compounds.