Sacral neuromodulation reprogramming: is it an office burden?
Sacral neuromodulation reprogramming: is it an office burden?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00192-008-0601-3
复制
发表时间：
2008-08-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Peters, Kenneth M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Burks, Frank N.;Diokno, Ananais C.;Peters, Kenneth M.
我们的目标是评估骶神经调节（SNM）重编程的负担和重编程的原因，并将其与潜在的诊断相关联。对 2002 年 11 月至 2005 年 12 月期间连续植入 SNM 的 50 名受试者进行了回顾性审查。在 50 名 SNM 植入者中，有 47 名受试者得到了充分的随访。平均年龄为 53.1 岁（22-90 岁），其中 83% 为女性。在进行的 SNM 中，91.5% 是因为尿急、尿频或尿失禁而进行的，其中 47.4% 患有间质性膀胱炎。总体而言，记录了 239 次编程访问，受试者平均每年有两次重新编程访问。与重编程事件的数量和患者年龄、性别、植入原因或诊断没有相关性。这些数据表明重编程事件的数量很少，并且大多数是作为常规随访的一部分进行的。在患有间质性膀胱炎的受试者中没有发现额外的负担。
Our objective was to evaluate the burden of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) reprogramming and the reasons for reprogramming, and to correlate these with the underlying diagnosis. A retrospective review of 50 consecutive subjects implanted with SNM was completed from November 2002 through December 2005. Of the 50 SNM implants, 47 subjects had adequate follow-up. The mean age was 53.1 (22-90 years) with 83% women. Of the SNM performed, 91.5% were done for urinary urgency, frequency, or incontinence and 47.4% of those had interstitial cystitis. Overall, 239 programming visits were recorded, and subjects on average had two reprogramming visits per year. There was no correlation with number of reprogramming events and patient age, sex, reason for implantation, or diagnosis. These data suggest that the number of reprogramming episodes is small, and the majority is done as part of routine follow-up. No additional burden was seen in subjects with interstitial cystitis.