Meandering Europeanisation. EU policy instruments and policy convergence in Georgia under the Eastern Partnership
Meandering Europeanisation. EU policy instruments and policy convergence in Georgia under the Eastern Partnership
复制标题
曲折的欧洲化。
DOI：
10.1080/21599165.2013.807804
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Delcour L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Delcour L
借鉴拉斯库姆斯和勒加莱斯的政策工具的方法，本文探讨了代表性和意义的东部伙伴关系的工具及其对伙伴国家的政策实践的影响。基于两个部门的具体研究（欧盟在食品安全和签证自由化的工具）在欧盟-格鲁吉亚的关系，文章认为，有一个转变的逻辑背后的欧盟的政策工具。虽然东部伙伴关系的工具箱提供了参与性工具和等级政策转移的创新组合，但欧盟与邻国互动的实践突出了后者的明显优势。越来越多地依赖条件性，不仅有助于（重新）调整欧盟-东欧邻国在制定政策方面的关系。这也影响到伙伴国家政策趋同的做法。通过强加条件而不适应格鲁吉亚的具体需求，欧盟的方法产生了更系统但更肤浅的政策趋同。
Drawing upon the policy instrument approach developed by Lascoumes and Le Galès, this article examines the representations and meanings underlying the Eastern Partnership’s tools and their effects on policy practices in partner countries. Based upon two sector-specific studies (EU instruments in food safety and visa liberalisation) in EU-Georgia relations, the article maintains that there has been a shift in the logic underlying the EU’s policy instruments. While the Eastern Partnership’s toolbox offers an innovative combination of participatory instruments and hierarchical policy transfer, the practice of EU-neighbours’ interactions highlights a clear predominance of the latter. The increased reliance upon conditionality has not only contributed to (re)structuring EU-Eastern neighbours relations in terms of agenda-setting. It has also affected practices of policy convergence in partner countries. By imposing conditionality while failing to adjust to Georgia’s specific needs, the EU’s approach generates more systematic, yet shallow policy convergence.
“我们的规模适合所有人”：欧洲和地中海的规范力量
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
F. Bicchi
通讯作者：
F. Bicchi