Reviewing the ICS 2002 terminology report: the ongoing debate.
Reviewing the ICS 2002 terminology report: the ongoing debate.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/nau.20737
复制
发表时间:
2009-01-01
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Sand, Peter
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Abrams, Paul;Artibani, Walter;Sand, Peter
These included ‘‘... impossible to defer...,’’or ‘‘... very difficult to defer,’’and adding ‘‘..., for fear of leakage...’’to the end of the definition. However, in discussion it was agreed that although urgency was frequently very difficult to defer for fear of leakage, this was not always the case, and sufferers could appreciate occasions when urgency could be relatively easily suppressed so that voiding occurred at a later time. Perhaps the idiomatic expression ‘‘When I’ve got to go, I’ve got to go!’’would explain urgency most easily to patients.Urgency incontinence: there was general agreement that urge incontinence should be renamed as urgency incontinence to be consistent with the term urgency and to avoid the use of ‘‘urge" which in the English language has the same meaning as ‘‘desire’’which should be the preferred term. Similarly the term urge syndrome should be changed to urgency syndrome.