Penal policy and political economy

Penal policy and political economy
复制标题

刑事政策与政治经济学

DOI:
10.1177/1748895806068581
复制
发表时间:
2006
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
J. Dignan
J. Dignan
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Cavadino;J. Dignan

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

全球化没有、也不可能导致全球刑事政策和实践的同质化。本文通过对 12 个当代资本主义国家(美国、英格兰和威尔士、澳大利亚、新西兰、南非、德国、荷兰、法国、意大利、瑞典、芬兰和日本)刑罚制度的研究,表明这些国家的政治经济学可以大致分为新自由主义、保守法团主义、社会民主主义或东方法团主义。这种分类与每个国家的刑罚文化和监禁率密切相关。讨论了这种关联的原因。一个关键因素可能是具有不同政治经济类型的社会对异常个体的“包容性”而不是“排他性”的程度。
Globalization has not led, and is unlikely to lead, to a global homogenization of penal policy and practices. Drawing on a study of penal systems in 12 contemporary capitalist countries (the United States of America, England and Wales, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Italy, Sweden, Finland and Japan), this article demonstrates that the political economies of such countries can be broadly categorized as neo-liberal, conservative corporatist, social democratic or oriental corporatist. This categorization is strongly related to the punitiveness of the penal culture and the rates of imprisonment to be found in each country. The reasons for this association are discussed. One crucial factor may be the degree to which societies with different types of political economy are ‘inclusive’ rather than ‘exclusive’ towards deviant individuals.