Reliability and validity of the revised experiences in close relationships (ECR-R) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment
Reliability and validity of the revised experiences in close relationships (ECR-R) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0146167205276865
复制
发表时间：
2005-11-01
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Liu, JH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sibley, CG;Fischer, R;Liu, JH
三项研究考察了心理测量学特性（即，Fraley，Waller，and Brennan's Revised Experiences in Close Relationships（ECR-R）self-report measure of romantic attachment anxiety（model of self）and avoidance（model of others）.纵向分析表明，ECR-R提供了高度稳定的指标，在3周内的潜伏依恋（85%的共享方差）。分层线性模型分析进一步验证了ECR-R，表明它解释了与浪漫伴侣互动期间经历的依恋相关情绪的社交互动日记评级中30%至40%的人与人之间的差异，而与家人和朋友互动时只有5%至15%。指南提供了关于高度可靠和精确的浪漫依恋措施的条件，如ECR-R，被认为是必要的，以及较短的，虽然稍微不太可靠的措施，如巴塞洛缪和霍洛维茨的关系问卷，也可能是可行的。
Three studies examine the psychometric properties (i.e., the test-retest reliability, convergent, and discriminant validity) of Fraley, Waller, and Brennan's Revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR-R) self-report measure of romantic attachment anxiety (model of self) and avoidance (model of others). Longitudinal analyses suggest that the ECR-R provided highly stable indicators of latent attachment during a 3-week period (85% shared variance). Hierarchical linear modeling analyses further validated the ECR-R, suggesting that it explained between 30% to 40% of the between-person variation in social interaction diary ratings of attachment-related emotions experienced during interactions with a romantic partner and only 5% to 15% of that in interactions with family and friends. Guidelines are offered regarding the conditions where highly reliable and precise measures of romantic attachment, such as the ECR-R, are deemed necessary and where shorter, albeit slightly less reliable measures, such as Bartholomew and Horowitz's Relationship Questionnaire, may also be viable.