Setting or mixed ability? Teachers' views of the organisation of pupils for learning
Setting or mixed ability? Teachers' views of the organisation of pupils for learning
复制标题
设定还是混合能力？
DOI：
10.1111/1471-3802.00008
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
M. Sutherland
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chris Smith;M. Sutherland
本文探讨如何在学校工作人员制定有关学生组织的决定。来自苏格兰各地的一小部分中小学参与了这项研究。
1996年，女王陛下的监察员发表了一份题为《人人享有成就》的报告，设想该报告将成为学校评估课堂组织有效性的基础。这份报告书，特别是其中建议有效组织安排所依据的六项原则，构成了这项研究的组织架构。
这项研究有三个主要目标：
1确定学校教职员在决定采用哪种组织形式时，在多大程度上使用了HMI报告中概述的原则
2评论教学人员对现有安排的看法
3确定如何评估对教与学的影响。
This paper examines how staff in schools formulate decisions about pupil organisation. A small sample of primary and secondary schools from across Scotland was involved in the study.
In 1996 Her Majesty's Inspectors published a report entitled Achievement for All (SOEID, 1996) which, it was envisaged, would form the basis of school evaluations into the effectiveness of classroom organisation. This report, and in particular the six principles on which it suggested effective organisational arrangements should rest, formed the organising framework for the study.
The study had three main aims:
1to ascertain the extent to which the principles outlined in the HMI report had been used by school staff when making decisions about which form of organisation to use
2to comment on the perceptions of teaching staff of how well the arrangements in place were working
3to ascertain how the impact on teaching and learning was being evaluated.