Deep Disagreement, the Dark Enlightenment, and the Rhetoric of the Red Pill
Deep Disagreement, the Dark Enlightenment, and the Rhetoric of the Red Pill
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/japp.12331
复制
发表时间：
2019-07-01
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
Aikin, Scott F.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aikin, Scott F.
深刻的分歧是不具备进行富有成效的辩论交流的辩证条件的分歧。这些分歧中的一种观点是，另一方被欺骗了，或者对某种幻觉如此无知和自满，没有交换的希望。黑暗启蒙运动对自由民主和进步政治的批判（这引发了另类右翼运动）就是在这个前提下进行的，他们称自己的批判哲学为“红色药丸”，并将反对派的纲领称为“大教堂”。尽管他们与进步人士的分歧很深，但有证据表明，在这种分歧很深的情况下，他们有一个乐观的批判性对话计划。
Deep disagreements are disagreements wherein the dialectical conditions for fruitful argumentative exchange do not obtain. One view from within these disagreements is that the other side has been duped or is so deeply ignorant of and complacent with some illusion, there is no hope for exchange. The Dark Enlightenment's critique of liberal democracy and progressive politics (which gave rise to the alt-right movement) proceeds on this premise, calling their critical philosophy 'the red pill' and terming the opposition's program 'the Cathedral'. Despite the depth of their disagreement with progressives, there is evidence for an optimistic program of critical dialogue in this instance of deep disagreement.