Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers.
Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers.
复制标题
正常观察者定量自动视野检查的变异性。
DOI:
10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33647-9
复制
发表时间:
1986
期刊:
影响因子:
13.7
通讯作者:
Labermeier,PK
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lewis,RA;Johnson,CA;Keltner,JL;Labermeier,PK
The test/retest variability in different regions of the visual field were evauated in six commercially available automated threshold static perimeters using normal volunteers. Three of the devices were projection perimeters (Squid®, Octopus 500®, Humphrey Field Analyzer®) and three of them used light-emitting diode stimuli (Dicon 2000®, Fieldmaster 50®, Digilab 350®). The authors' results show that, although some devices were better than others, all have some degree of variability. In addition, they found that there is increased variability from the central 10° out to 30° eccentricity for each perimeter.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
E. Werner;N. Saheb;D. Thomas
通讯作者:
D. Thomas
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
H. Bebie;F. Fankhauser;Jürg Spahr
通讯作者:
Jürg Spahr
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1985
期刊:
Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Keltner;C. Johnson;R. Lewis
通讯作者:
R. Lewis
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1981
期刊:
Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Keltner;C. Johnson
通讯作者:
C. Johnson
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1984
期刊:
A M A Archives of Ophthalmology
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Flammer;S. Drance;M. Schulzer
通讯作者:
M. Schulzer