The social-psychological study of conflict: Rejoinder to a critique
The social-psychological study of conflict: Rejoinder to a critique
复制标题
冲突的社会心理学研究：对批评的反驳
DOI：
10.1002/ejsp.2420040404
复制
发表时间：
1974
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
M. Deutsch
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Deutsch
这篇论文是对普隆发表在本刊上的关于冲突的社会心理学的批判的一种反驳。答辩书回顾了美国社会心理学的历史、“解决冲突”的含义、囚徒困境中的困境的本质，以及普隆显然误解了的其他相关问题。答辩书批评了普隆对马克思主义理论的粗陋的“经济决定论”版本，并简要地考虑了权力在政治中的作用。本文概述了本作者对冲突的社会心理学方法的特点，并建议这种方法与那些寻求带来社会变革的人的智力问题直接相关。
This paper is a rejoinder to Plon's critique of the social psychology of conflict published in this Journal. The rejoinder reviews the history of American social psychology, the meaning of ‘conflict resolution’, the nature of the dilemma in the Prisoner's Dilemma, and other related matters, which Plon has apparently misconstrued. The rejoinder criticizes Plon's crude ‘economic determinism’ version of Marxist theory and briefly considers the role of power in politics. The characteristics of the present author's social-psychological approach to conflict is outlined, and it is suggested that such an approach has direct relevance to the intellectual concerns of those who seek to bring about social change.