Inka settlement planning
Inka settlement planning
复制标题
印加定居点规划
DOI：
10.5860/choice.28-4576
复制
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Hyslop
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Hyslop
史前史，并指出了许多问题，仍然面临着我们（岛田1990）。我想通过关注印加文化的研究现状来扩展他的评论，并以最近的两本书为例，说明我们在理解这种接触时期文化方面所取得的进展。对印加文化的研究一直立足于几个学科的视角，最著名的是考古学，民族史，艺术史和建筑史。这种跨学科的考察对于研究一种扩张主义文化至关重要，这种文化留下了丰富的物质遗存，但没有文字记录，其扩张因与欧洲文化的遭遇而中断，欧洲文化成功地实施了自己的帝国议程。考古学和民族史之间的密切联系可能最生动地体现在以下观察中：我们所掌握的关于几个重要印加遗址的第一份考古报告是由耶稣会士伯纳贝·科博（Bernabe Cobo）在世纪早期撰写的，并被纳入了一份构成我们关于印加人最重要的民族史资料之一的记录中（参见Rowe，in Cobo 1990：viii）。民族历史文献--接触时期的历史、早期目击者的描述和殖民地时期的法律的文献，是考古学家试图在古老的骨头上添加血肉的基础。具有必要的古文字学技能和档案材料的历史学家已经转录和评估了一些重要的文件;其中包括玛丽亚·罗斯特沃斯基（1962，1977，1988），瓦尔德马·埃斯皮诺萨·索里亚诺（1974，1987;迪兹·德·圣米格尔1964），奥拉西奥·维拉纽瓦·乌尔泰加（1970）和玛丽亚·德尔卡门·马丁鲁比奥（贝坦佐斯1987）。这些和其他历史学家的工作
prehistory and noted many of the problems that still confront us (Shimada 1990). I would like to extend his comments by focusing on the state of research on Inca culture, using two recent books as examples of the progress we are making in understanding this contact-period culture. Research on Inca culture has been grounded in the perspectives of several disciplines, most notably archaeology, ethnohistory, and the history of art and architecture. Such interdisciplinary examination is essential to the study of an expansionist culture that left abundant material remains, but no written record, and whose expansion was cut short by an encounter with a European culture that successfully enforced its own imperial agenda. The close ties between archaeology and ethnohistory are perhaps most graphically noted by the observation that the first archaeological reports that we have for several important Inca sites were written early in the 17th century by the Jesuit, Bernabe Cobo, and are incorporated in an account that constitutes one of our most important ethnohistorical sources on the Incas (see Rowe, in Cobo 1990: viii). Ethnohistorical documents--contact-period histories, early eyewitness accounts, and Colonial legal documentshave been fundamental to archaeologists' attempts to put flesh on old bones. Historians with the requisite paleographic skills and access to archival materials have transcribed and evaluated a number of important documents; among them are Maria Rostworowski (1962, 1977, 1988), Waldemar Espinoza Soriano (1974, 1987; Didz de San Miguel 1964), Horacio Villanueva Urteaga (1970), and Maria del Carmen Martin Rubio (Betanzos 1987). The work of these and other historians has made it