Where Have All the Emergencies Gone? The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Obstetric and Gynecologic Procedures and Consults at a New York City Hospital.
Where Have All the Emergencies Gone? The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Obstetric and Gynecologic Procedures and Consults at a New York City Hospital.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.012
复制
发表时间:
2021-07
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Hur HC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Spurlin EE;Han ES;Silver ER;May BL;Tatonetti NP;Ingram MA;Jin Z;Hur C;Advincula AP;Hur HC
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on surgical volume and emergency department (ED) consults across obstetrics-gynecology (OB-GYN) services at a New York City hospital. Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary care academic medical center in New York City. Women undergoing OB-GYN ED consults or surgeries between February 1, 2020 and April 15, 2020. March 16 institutional moratorium on elective surgeries. The volume and types of surgeries and ED consults were compared before and after the COVID-19 moratorium. During the pandemic, the average weekly volume of ED consults and gynecology (GYN) surgeries decreased, whereas obstetric (OB) surgeries remained stable. The proportions of OB-GYN ED consults, GYN surgeries, and OB surgeries relative to all ED consults, all surgeries, and all labor and delivery patients were 1.87%, 13.8%, 54.6% in the pre–COVID-19 time frame (February 1–March 15) vs 1.53%, 21.3%, 79.7% in the COVID-19 time frame (March 16–April 15), representing no significant difference in proportions of OB-GYN ED consults (p = .464) and GYN surgeries (p = .310) before and during COVID-19, with a proportionate increase in OB surgeries (p <.002). The distribution of GYN surgical case types changed significantly during the pandemic with higher proportions of emergent surgeries for ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages, and concern for cancer (p <.001). Alternatively, the OB surgery distribution of case types remained relatively constant. This study highlights how the pandemic has affected the ways that patients in OB-GYN access and receive care. Institutional policies suspending elective surgeries during the pandemic decreased GYN surgical volume and affected the types of cases performed. This decrease was not appreciated for OB surgical volume, reflecting the nonelective and time-sensitive nature of obstetric care. A decrease in ED consults was noted during the pandemic begging the question “Where have all the emergencies gone?” Although the moratorium on elective procedures was necessary, “elective” GYN surgeries remain medically indicated to address symptoms such as pain and bleeding and to prevent serious medical sequelae such as severe anemia requiring transfusion. As we continue to battle COVID-19, we must not lose sight of those patients whose care has been deferred.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
Amparore, Daniele;Claps, Francesco;Campi, Riccardo
通讯作者:
Campi, Riccardo
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Hall, Evelyn F.;Raker, Christina A.;Hampton, Brittany S.
通讯作者:
Hampton, Brittany S.
DOI:
10.24875/recice.m20000123
发表时间:
2020-04-01
期刊:
REC-INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
影响因子:
--
作者:
Rodriguez-Leor, Oriol;Cid-Alvarez, Belen;Moreno, Raul
通讯作者:
Moreno, Raul
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
Liang, Zhen Chang;Ooi, Shirley Beng Suat;Wang, Wilson
通讯作者:
Wang, Wilson
影响因子:
7.2
作者:
Wright, Jason D.;Herzog, Thomas J.;Hershman, Dawn L.
通讯作者:
Hershman, Dawn L.