In search of the elusive CHI design paper
In search of the elusive CHI design paper
复制标题
寻找难以捉摸的 CHI 设计纸
DOI：
10.1145/3039901
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gaver B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gaver B
在CHI论文委员会会议上，我们认为分享设计小组委员会对我们的发现的一些想法可能会有所帮助。我们有时间在酒店的会议室里进行小组讨论，我们分享了长达两天的时间，讨论和辩论从100多份意见书中接受哪些论文。在所有的剖析和提问之后，无论是在房间里，还是在早餐、午餐、晚餐和休息时间，我们都做好了充分的准备，思考池氏设计论文如何成功，以及它们往往存在的不足之处。我们希望分享我们的观察结果，是为了鼓励和安抚那些想要提交给CHI的设计师，向评审者建议他们应该在提交的文章中寻找什么，并最终在会议上继续提高设计论文的质量。请放心，今年的论文质量至少和往年一样好。尽管如此，小组委员会还是不禁感到些许不满，甚至有些担心。为什么这么多的意见书似乎只与设计切题相关？为什么提交给迟浩田的“真正的设计论文”如此之少？
CHI paper committee meeting, we thought it might be helpful to share a few reflections from the Design subcommittee on our findings. We had time for a group discussion in the hotel meeting room we had shared over a long two days, discussing and debating which papers to accept from well over 100 submissions. After all the dissecting and questioning, both in the room and during breakfasts, lunches, dinners, and breaks, we were all well prepared to think about how CHI design papers can succeed, and where they tend to fall short. Our hope in sharing our observations is to encourage and reassure designers wanting to submit to CHI, to suggest to reviewers what they should look for in submissions, and, in the end, to continue to improve the quality of design papers at the conference.Rest assured, the quality of this year’s papers is at least as good as in years past. Nonetheless, the subcommittee couldn’t help but feel a little dissatisfied, even worried. Why do so many submissions seem only tangentially relevant for design? Why are so few “real design papers” submitted to CHI?