Low back pain in junior Australian Rules football: a cross-sectional survey of elite juniors, non-elite juniors and non-football playing controls (Retracted Article)
Low back pain in junior Australian Rules football: a cross-sectional survey of elite juniors, non-elite juniors and non-football playing controls (Retracted Article)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1471-2474-11-241
复制
发表时间：
2010-10-19
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Dragasevic, George
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hoskins, Wayne;Pollard, Henry;Dragasevic, George
背景资料：未对青少年澳大利亚规则足球运动员的腰痛进行调查，尽管发现背痛在高级足球运动员中比非运动控制更普遍，严重和频繁，并且发现青少年背痛是成人背痛的强有力预测因素。本研究的目的是确定青少年澳大利亚规则足球运动员和对照组中腰痛的患病率、强度、质量和频率，并比较组间数据。方法：对男性非精英青少年（n = 60）和精英青少年运动员（n = 102）进行了横断面调查，沿着对非足球运动员进行了方便样本（学龄儿童）（n = 100）。受试者完成了一份关于腰痛的自我报告问卷，其中包括四重视觉焦虑量表和麦吉尔疼痛问卷（简表），沿着了来自澳大利亚流行病学研究的其他问题。使用线性混合模型（残差最大似然）方法比较组间差异。Log-linear models was used in the analysis of contingency tables.Results：对于当前、平均和最佳腰痛水平，精英青少年运动员的疼痛水平较高（p < 0.001），而非精英青少年运动员和对照组之间的平均和最佳腰痛水平无差异。对于最严重的腰痛，平均疼痛评分存在显著差异。优秀大三学生与非优秀大三学生之间的差异（p = 0.040）和优秀大三学生与对照组之间的差异（p < 0.001）具有显著性，但非优秀大三学生与对照组之间的差异不显著。患腰痛的几率从对照组的45%增加到非精英青少年的55%，精英青少年的66.7%。疼痛患者经历慢性疼痛的几率在对照组中为16%，在非精英青少年和精英青少年球员中为41%。精英青少年运动员更频繁地经历腰痛（p = 0.002），非精英青少年和对照组之间的频率没有差异。超过25%的精英青少年和非精英青少年球员报告说，背部疼痛影响他们的表现的一些时间或great.Conclusions：这项研究表明，当与非精英青少年球员和非足球运动员的年龄相仿，精英青少年球员的经验背部疼痛更严重，更频繁，有较高的患病率和慢性率。
Background: Low back pain in junior Australian Rules footballers has not been investigated despite findings that back pain is more prevalent, severe and frequent in senior footballers than non-athletic controls and findings that adolescent back pain is a strong predictor for adult back pain. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, intensity, quality and frequency of low back pain in junior Australian Rules footballers and a control group and to compare this data between groups.Methods: A cross-sectional survey of male non-elite junior (n = 60) and elite junior players (n = 102) was conducted along with a convenience sample of non-footballers (school children) (n = 100). Subjects completed a self-reported questionnaire on low back pain incorporating the Quadruple Visual Analogue Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire (short form), along with additional questions adapted from an Australian epidemiological study. Linear Mixed Model (Residual Maximum Likelihood) methods were used to compare differences between groups. Log-linear models were used in the analysis of contingency tables.Results: For current, average and best low back pain levels, elite junior players had higher pain levels (p < 0.001), with no difference noted between non-elite juniors and controls for average and best low back pain. For low back pain at worst, there were significant differences in the mean pain scores. The difference between elite juniors and non-elite juniors (p = 0.040) and between elite juniors and controls (p < 0.001) was significant, but not between non-elite juniors and controls. The chance of suffering low back pain increases from 45% for controls, through 55% for non-elite juniors to 66.7% for elite juniors. The chance that a pain sufferer experiences chronic pain is 16% for controls and 41% for non-elite junior and elite junior players. Elite junior players experienced low back pain more frequently (p = 0.002), with no difference in frequency noted between non-elite juniors and controls. Over 25% of elite junior and non-elite junior players reported that back pain impacted their performance some of the time or greater.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that when compared with non-elite junior players and non-footballers of a similar age, elite junior players experience back pain more severely and frequently and have higher prevalence and chronicity rates.