Resilience for disaster risk management in a changing climate: Practitioners' frames and practices
Resilience for disaster risk management in a changing climate: Practitioners' frames and practices
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.010
复制
发表时间：
2015-01-01
影响因子：
8.9
通讯作者：
Handmer, John
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aldunce, Paulina;Beilin, Ruth;Handmer, John
灾害风险管理文献和政策领域越来越多地使用复原力理念。然而，很少有实证研究关注从业者在实践中如何将复原力理念概念化和实施。利用 Hajer 的“社会互动话语理论”，这项研究有助于理解从业者如何在灾害风险管理制度安排变化的背景下构建、构建和理解复原力理念，其中明确包括复原力方法和气候变化考虑因素。该案例研究涉及在澳大利亚昆士兰州推出自然灾害恢复计划，该研究涉及昆士兰州的三个地点。使用的方法是观察不同的活动和实际地点，修订与自然灾害抵御能力计划相关的文件，以及对关键信息提供者（所有与该计划有直接互动的从业者）进行深入的半结构化访谈。研究结果表明，从业者以不同的方式构建了抗灾能力的含义，并且这些含义都嵌入在不同的故事情节中。在这些故事情节中，从业者对表征其复原力话语的七个话语类别给出了不同的解释和强调。自力更生成为最重要的话语类别之一，但我们认为，在宣传自力更生的价值观时需要谨慎。如果政策推动力是关注学习，那么研究结果表明，从体验式学习转向社会性学习也是相关的。本研究提出的结果为灾害风险管理和气候变化方面的政策设计和复原力理念的实施以及理论提供了有用的见解。 (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. 保留所有权利。
There is a growing use of resilience ideas within the disaster risk management literature and policy domain. However, few empirical studies have focused on how resilience ideas are conceptualized by practitioners, as they implement them in practice. Using Hajer's 'social-interactive discourse theory' this research contributes to the understanding of how practitioners frame, construct and make sense of resilience ideas in the context of changes in institutional arrangements for disaster risk management that explicitly include the resilience approach and climate change considerations. The case study involved the roll out of the Natural Disaster Resilience Program in Queensland, Australia, and the study involved three sites in Queensland. The methods used were observation of different activities and the physical sites, revision of documents related to the Natural Disaster Resilience Program and in-depth semi-structured interviews with key informants, all practitioners who had direct interaction with the program. The research findings show that practitioners construct the meaning of disaster resilience differently, and these are embedded in diverse storylines. Within these storylines, practitioners gave different interpretations and emphasis to the seven discourse categories that characterized their resilience discourse. Self-reliance emerged as one of the paramount discourse categories but we argue that caution needs to be used when promoting values of self-reliance. If the policy impetus is a focus on learning, research findings indicate it is also pertinent to move from experiential learning toward social learning. The results presented in this study provide helpful insights to inform policy design and implementation of resilience ideas in disaster risk management and climate change, and to inform theory. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.