Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization.
Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.099
复制
发表时间:
2021-07-05
期刊:
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Feikin DR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Patel MK;Bergeri I;Bresee JS;Cowling BJ;Crowcroft NS;Fahmy K;Hirve S;Kang G;Katz MA;Lanata CF;L'Azou Jackson M;Joshi S;Lipsitch M;Mwenda JM;Nogareda F;Orenstein WA;Ortiz JR;Pebody R;Schrag SJ;Smith PG;Srikantiah P;Subissi L;Valenciano M;Vaughn DW;Verani JR;Wilder-Smith A;Feikin DR
Phase 3 randomized-controlled trials have provided promising results of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, ranging from 50 to 95% against symptomatic disease as the primary endpoints, resulting in emergency use authorization/listing for several vaccines. However, given the short duration of follow-up during the clinical trials, strict eligibility criteria, emerging variants of concern, and the changing epidemiology of the pandemic, many questions still remain unanswered regarding vaccine performance. Post-introduction vaccine effectiveness evaluations can help us to understand the vaccine's effect on reducing infection and disease when used in real-world conditions. They can also address important questions that were either not studied or were incompletely studied in the trials and that will inform evolving vaccine policy, including assessment of the duration of effectiveness; effectiveness in key subpopulations, such as the very old or immunocompromised; against severe disease and death due to COVID-19; against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern; and with different vaccination schedules, such as number of doses and varying dosing intervals. WHO convened an expert panel to develop interim best practice guidance for COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness evaluations. We present a summary of the interim guidance, including discussion of different study designs, priority outcomes to evaluate, potential biases, existing surveillance platforms that can be used, and recommendations for reporting results.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
Jackson, Michael L.;Rothman, Kenneth J.
通讯作者:
Rothman, Kenneth J.
影响因子:
13.6
作者:
Garcia-Albeniz, Xabier;Hsu, John;Hernan, Miguel A.
通讯作者:
Hernan, Miguel A.
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2035389
发表时间:
2021-02-04
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Baden LR;El Sahly HM;Essink B;Kotloff K;Frey S;Novak R;Diemert D;Spector SA;Rouphael N;Creech CB;McGettigan J;Khetan S;Segall N;Solis J;Brosz A;Fierro C;Schwartz H;Neuzil K;Corey L;Gilbert P;Janes H;Follmann D;Marovich M;Mascola J;Polakowski L;Ledgerwood J;Graham BS;Bennett H;Pajon R;Knightly C;Leav B;Deng W;Zhou H;Han S;Ivarsson M;Miller J;Zaks T;COVE Study Group
通讯作者:
COVE Study Group
影响因子:
16.6
作者:
Griffith GJ;Morris TT;Tudball MJ;Herbert A;Mancano G;Pike L;Sharp GC;Sterne J;Palmer TM;Davey Smith G;Tilling K;Zuccolo L;Davies NM;Hemani G
通讯作者:
Hemani G
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
Lipsitch M;Kahn R
通讯作者:
Kahn R