Tolerability of Mefloquine Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in HIV-Infected Pregnant Women in Benin

Tolerability of Mefloquine Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in HIV-Infected Pregnant Women in Benin
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/qai.0b013e3182615a58
复制
发表时间:
2012-09-01
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Cot, Michel
Cot, Michel
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Denoeud-Ndam, Lise;Clement, Marie-Caroline;Cot, Michel

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:研究甲氟喹间歇性预防治疗(MQ IPTp)对HIV感染孕妇和HIV阴性孕妇疟疾的耐受性。设计:前瞻性队列研究,比较来自贝宁2项临床试验的HIV阴性和HIV感染孕妇的样本。来自正在进行的PACOME试验的103名HIV感染妇女与来自以前试验的421名HIV阴性妇女进行了比较,这两项试验旨在评估以15 mg/kg剂量施用的MQ IPTp的功效和耐受性。描述性分析比较了根据HIV状态报告至少1种不良反应的女性比例。多水平Logistic回归分析确定了与报告每个MQ intake.Results的不良反应的概率相关的因素:头晕和呕吐是最常见的不良反应。HIV感染妇女的不良反应发生率较低(65%对78%,P = 0.009)。在多水平分析中,HIV感染[比值比(OR)= 0.23,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.08至0.61]降低了不良反应的风险,而可检测的病毒载量(OR = 2.46,95%CI = 1.07 ~ 5.66),首次摄入(与进一步摄入相比,OR = 5.26,95% CI = 3.70 - 7.14),年龄较大(OR = 1.62,95% CI = 1.13 ~ 2.32),文化程度越高(OR = 1.71,95% CI = 1.12 ~ 2.61)危险性越高。中度和严重的不良反应更频繁时,抗逆转录病毒药物开始伴随着MQ intake.Conclusions:这项研究提供了令人放心的数据使用MQ IPTp在HIV感染的孕妇。然而,频繁的不良反应仍然是中度的,并没有损害遵守MQ IPTp。在这一高危人群中,MQ可能是一个可接受的替代品,以防磺胺嘧啶-乙胺嘧啶失去其间歇性预防治疗的疗效。
Objective: To investigate the tolerability of mefloquine intermittent preventive treatment (MQ IPTp) for malaria in HIV-infected pregnant women compared with HIV-negative women.Design: Prospective cohort study comparing samples of HIV-negative and HIV- infected pregnant women from 2 clinical trials conducted in Benin.Methods: One hundred and three HIV-infected women from the ongoing PACOME trial were compared with 421 HIV-negative women from a former trial, both trials aiming to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of MQ IPTp, administered at the dose of 15 mg/kg. Descriptive analysis compared the proportion of women reporting at least 1 adverse reaction, according to HIV status. Multilevel logistic regression identified factors associated with the probability of reporting an adverse reaction for each MQ intake.Results: Dizziness and vomiting were the most frequent adverse reactions. Adverse reactions were less frequent in HIV-infected women (65% versus 78%, P = 0.009). In multilevel analysis, HIV infection [odds ratio (OR) = 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.08 to 0.61] decreased the risk for adverse reactions, whereas detectable viral load (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.07 to 5.66), first intake (versus further intakes, OR = 5.26, 95% CI = 3.70 to 7.14), older age (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.32), and higher education level (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.12 to 2.61) increased the risk. Moderate and severe adverse reactions were more frequent when antiretrovirals were started concomitantly with a MQ intake.Conclusions: This study provides reassuring data on the use of MQ IPTp in HIV-infected pregnant women. However frequent, adverse reactions remained moderate and did not impair adherence to MQ IPTp. In this high-risk group, MQ might be an acceptable alternative in case sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine loses its efficacy for intermittent preventive treatment.