Effects of difference scheme type in high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes
Effects of difference scheme type in high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcp.2009.02.018
复制
发表时间:
2009-06
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
T. Nonomura;K. Fujii
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Nonomura;K. Fujii
The weighted compact nonlinear scheme (WCNS), developed by Deng and Zhang [1], is a high resolution scheme for flow fields including discontinuities. Deng and Zhang showed that WCNS has slightly higher resolution than the finite difference weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme (WENO)[2] and similar discontinuity capturing capability as WENO. WCNS has the following three advantages compared with WENO:(1) various flux splitting methods can be used, eg Roe’s flux difference splitting method (FDS)[3];(2) interpolation of flow variables can be used despite the finite difference formulation; and (3) freestream and vortex preservation properties are very good on a wavy grid [4]. Thus far, the higher-order WCNSs have been developed by Nonomura et al.[5] and Zhang et al.[6] up to the ninth-order, while Zhang et al. proposed interpolating flux instead of the conservative variables used both in the original version and in the higher-order version developed by Nonomura et al. These researches showed that the resolution increases with an increasing order of accuracy and higher-order WCNSs are much more effective. The WCNS procedure consists of three components [1]:(1) cell-node to cell-center weighted averaging interpolation of conservative variables,(2) flux evaluation at the cell-center and (3) cell-center to cell-node differencing. In the third component, various types of the cell-center to cell-node difference schemes are available. Deng and Zhang showed that the type of cell-center to cell-node difference scheme, explicit or tri-diagonal, does not affect the resolution of a fifth-order or fourthorder WCNS, because the weighted averaging interpolation (component 1) is dominant for its resolution [7].0021-9991/$-see front matter© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi: 10.1016/j. jcp. 2009.02. 018