Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals
Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005
复制
发表时间：
2008-04-01
影响因子：
11.1
通讯作者：
DuBois, David L.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Eby, Lillian T.;Allen, Tammy D.;DuBois, David L.
对辅导的研究通常是在学科孤岛内进行的，并以特定类型的辅导关系为重点。本文的目的是定量回顾辅导研究的三个主要领域(青年、学术、工作场所)，以确定与受教育者辅导结果相关的总体效果大小。我们还探讨了辅导和门徒结果之间的关系是否因辅导关系的类型(青年、学术、工作场所)而有所不同。结果表明，辅导与一系列良好的行为、态度、健康相关、关系、动机和职业结果相关，尽管效果一般较小。在不同类型的辅导中也发现了一些差异。总体而言，与青少年辅导相比，学术和工作场所辅导的效应度更大。对未来的研究、理论和应用实践提出了建议。(C)2007 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。
The study of mentoring has generally been conducted within disciplinary silos with a specific type of mentoring relationship as a focus. The purpose of this article is to quantitatively review the three major areas of mentoring research (youth, academic, workplace) to determine the overall effect size associated with mentoring outcomes for proteges. We also explored whether the relationship between mentoring and protege outcomes varied by the type of mentoring relationship (youth, academic, workplace). Results demonstrate that mentoring is associated with a wide range of favorable behavioral, attitudinal, health-related, relational, motivational, and career outcomes, although the effect size is generally small. Some differences were also found across type of mentoring. Generally, larger effect sizes were detected for academic and workplace mentoring compared to youth mentoring. Implications for future research, theory, and applied practice are provided. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.