Differences between traits: properties associated with interjudge agreement.
Differences between traits: properties associated with interjudge agreement.
复制标题
特征之间的差异：与法官间一致性相关的属性。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.409
复制
发表时间：
1987
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Dobroth,KM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Funder,DC;Dobroth,KM
本研究是关于人格特质的属性与其在真实个体中应用的一致性之间的关系。受试者在9个主观维度上对加州Q-Set的100个人格项目进行了评分，其中6个维度的第一主成分得分很高。这一因素被解释为反映了每个特征对外部观察者的“易见性”。将每个特质应用于真实个体的实际法官间一致性通过两种方式进行评估：在两个独立样本中评估自我-他者协议，在三个样本中评估同辈间协议。大多数Q项目的一致性令人印象深刻和稳定。被应用于法官间一致性最大的个体的特征是那些似乎最容易被看到的特征，并且往往与外向呈正相关，与神经质呈负相关(通过McCrae，Costa，&Busch，1986的因素分析确定)。结果表明：(A)定义外向的特征在社会行为中相对直接地表现出来，因此很容易判断；(B)定义神经质的特征不那么明显，因此判断也不那么准确；(C)外行的人格知觉者通常对这种特征之间的差异很敏感。
The present study concerns the relation between properties of personality traits and the agreement with which they are applied to real individuals. Subjects rated the 100 personality items of the California Q-Set on nine subjective dimensions, six of which loaded highly on a first principal component. This factor was interpreted as reflecting each trait's “easy visibility” to an outside observer. Actual interjudge agreement in applying each trait to real individuals was assessed in two ways: Self-other agreement was assessed in two independent samples, and interpeer agreement was assessed in three samples. Impressive and stable agreement was found for most Q items. The traits that were applied to individuals with the greatest interjudge agreement were the same ones that seemed most easily visible and tended to be positively relevant to extraversion and negatively relevant to neuroticism (identified through a factor analysis by McCrae, Costa, & Busch, 1986). The results suggest (a) that traits defining extraversion are revealed relatively directly in social behavior and, therefore, are easy to judge,(b) that traits defining neuroticism are less visible and, so, are judged less accurately, and (c) that lay perceivers of personality are generally sensitive to this difference between traits.