How robust are the estimated effects of air pollution on health? Accounting for model uncertainty using Bayesian model averaging.
How robust are the estimated effects of air pollution on health? Accounting for model uncertainty using Bayesian model averaging.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.sste.2016.04.001
复制
发表时间:
2016-08
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Leyland AH
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pannullo F;Lee D;Waclawski E;Leyland AH
We explored the sensitivity of the pollution-health effect to three factors. Estimation of NO2, choice of deprivation and choice of spatial autocorrelation model. Choice of these factors leads to a wide variation in pollution-health effects. BMA is utilised to estimate an overall effect while accounting for model uncertainty. Overall, a positive but borderline pollution-health effect was obtained. The long-term impact of air pollution on human health can be estimated from small-area ecological studies in which the health outcome is regressed against air pollution concentrations and other covariates, such as socio-economic deprivation. Socio-economic deprivation is multi-factorial and difficult to measure, and includes aspects of income, education, and housing as well as others. However, these variables are potentially highly correlated, meaning one can either create an overall deprivation index, or use the individual characteristics, which can result in a variety of pollution-health effects. Other aspects of model choice may affect the pollution-health estimate, such as the estimation of pollution, and spatial autocorrelation model. Therefore, we propose a Bayesian model averaging approach to combine the results from multiple statistical models to produce a more robust representation of the overall pollution-health effect. We investigate the relationship between nitrogen dioxide concentrations and cardio-respiratory mortality in West Central Scotland between 2006 and 2012.