A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of endovascular thrombectomy compared with best medical treatment for acute ischemic stroke.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of endovascular thrombectomy compared with best medical treatment for acute ischemic stroke.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/ijs.12618
复制
发表时间:
2015-12
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Buchan AM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Balami JS;Sutherland BA;Edmunds LD;Grunwald IQ;Neuhaus AA;Hadley G;Karbalai H;Metcalf KA;DeLuca GC;Buchan AM
Acute ischemic strokes involving occlusion of large vessels usually recanalize poorly following treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. Recent studies have shown higher recanalization and higher good outcome rates with endovascular therapy compared with best medical management alone. A systematic review and meta‐analysis investigating the benefits of all randomized controlled trials of endovascular thrombectomy where at least 25% of patients were treated with a thrombectomy device for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke compared with best medical treatment have yet to be performed. To perform a systematic review and a meta‐analysis evaluating the effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy compared with best medical care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Our search identified 437 publications, from which eight studies (totaling 2423 patients) matched the inclusion criteria. Overall, endovascular thrombectomy was associated with improved functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) [odds ratio 1·56 (1·32–1·85), P < 0·00001]. There was a tendency toward decreased mortality [odds ratio 0·84 (0·67–1·05), P = 0·12], and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was not increased [odds ratio 1·03 (0·71–1·49), P = 0·88] compared with best medical management alone. The odds ratio for a favorable functional outcome increased to 2·23 (1·77–2·81, P < 0·00001) when newer generation thrombectomy devices were used in greater than 50% of the cases in each trial. There is clear evidence for improvement in functional independence with endovascular thrombectomy compared with standard medical care, suggesting that endovascular thrombectomy should be considered the standard effective treatment alongside thombolysis in eligible patients.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Moher D;Shamseer L;Clarke M;Ghersi D;Liberati A;Petticrew M;Shekelle P;Stewart LA;PRISMA-P Group
通讯作者:
PRISMA-P Group
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Osanai, Toshiya;Pasupuleti, Vinay;Uchino, Ken
通讯作者:
Uchino, Ken
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Berkhemer, O. A.;Fransen, P. S. S.;Dippel, D. W. J.
通讯作者:
Dippel, D. W. J.
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa1214300
发表时间:
2013-03-07
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Broderick JP;Palesch YY;Demchuk AM;Yeatts SD;Khatri P;Hill MD;Jauch EC;Jovin TG;Yan B;Silver FL;von Kummer R;Molina CA;Demaerschalk BM;Budzik R;Clark WM;Zaidat OO;Malisch TW;Goyal M;Schonewille WJ;Mazighi M;Engelter ST;Anderson C;Spilker J;Carrozzella J;Ryckborst KJ;Janis LS;Martin RH;Foster LD;Tomsick TA;Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators
通讯作者:
Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators
影响因子:
168.9
作者:
Barber, PA;Demchuk, AM;Buchan, AM
通讯作者:
Buchan, AM