Development and validation of climate change system thinking instrument (CCSTI) for measuring system thinking on climate change content

Development and validation of climate change system thinking instrument (CCSTI) for measuring system thinking on climate change content
复制标题

气候变化系统思维工具(CCSTI)的开发和验证,用于测量气候变化内容的系统思维

DOI:
10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012046
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Tjasyono
B. Tjasyono
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Meilinda;N. Rustaman;H. Firman;B. Tjasyono

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

气候变化系统思维量表(CCSTI)是用来测量一个人对气候变化概念的系统思维能力的。CCSTI的开发分为四个阶段,包括仪器草案开发、验证和评估(包括可读材料测试、专家验证和现场测试)。现场测试的结果进行了分析,在Cronbach的阿尔法测试的可读性得分。对80名生物教育、物理教育和化学教育专业的大学生随机进行了草稿测试。内容验证指数得分为0.86,这意味着开发的CCSTI被归类为非常合适,问题指标和Cronbach α约为0.605,这意味着被归类为不可取到最低可接受。从45个系统思维问题中,有37个有效问题分布在系统思维的四个指标中,即系统思维阶段I(先决条件)、系统思维阶段II(基本)、系统思维阶段III(中级)和系统思维阶段IV(连贯专家)。
The Climate Change System Thinking Instrument (CCSTI) is developed to measure a system thinking ability in the concept of climate change. CCSTI is developed in four phase’s development including instrument draft development, validation and evaluation including readable material test, expert validation, and field test. The result of field test is analyzed by looking at the readability score in Cronbach’s alpha test. Draft instrument is tested on college students majoring in Biology Education, Physics Education, and Chemistry Education randomly with a total number of 80 college students. Score of Content Validation Index at 0.86, which means that the CCSTI developed are categorized as very appropriate with question indicators and Cronbach’s alpha about 0.605 which mean categorized undesirable to minimal acceptable. From 45 questions of system thinking, there are 37 valid questions spread in four indicators of system thinking, which are system thinking phase I (pre-requirement), system thinking phase II (basic), system thinking phase III (intermediate), and system thinking phase IV (coherent expert).