Trust in Community-Engaged Research Partnerships: A Methodological Overview of Designing a Multisite Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Initiative

Trust in Community-Engaged Research Partnerships: A Methodological Overview of Designing a Multisite Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Initiative
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0163278718819719
复制
发表时间:
2020-09-01
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Corbie-Smith, Giselle
Corbie-Smith, Giselle
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kim, Mimi M.;Cheney, Ann;Corbie-Smith, Giselle

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

社区参与研究(CEnR)建立在临床和转化科学奖(CTSA)框架的优势之上,以解决服务不足和少数民族社区的健康问题。有一个缺乏的研究,确定信任的过程中发展的CEnR的伙伴关系。本研究回应了从多利益相关者的角度建立和保持信任的实证调查的需要。我们使用概念图进行了一项多机构试点研究,以更好地理解信任(CEnR伙伴关系的关键成果)如何充当“社会资本”。“概念图被用来收集来自三个利益相关者群体的数据:社区,医疗保健和三个CTSA的学术研究合作伙伴。概念图是一种混合方法,允许参与者集思广益,确定有助于概念的因素,并描述这些因素相互关联的方式。这项研究提供了重要的见解,制定一套初始的信任措施,可用于跨CTSA了解关键利益相关者群体之间的信任概念化的差异和相似之处,跟踪研究中公众信任的变化,识别信任的积极和消极方面,识别保持信任的特征,并为未来的研究方向提供信息。
Community-engaged research (CEnR) builds on the strengths of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) framework to address health in underserved and minority communities. There is a paucity of studies that identify the process from which trust develops in CEnR partnerships. This study responds to the need for empirical investigation of building and maintaining trust from a multistakeholder perspective. We conducted a multi-institutional pilot study using concept mapping with to better understand how trust, a critical outcome of CEnR partnerships, can act as "social capital." Concept mapping was used to collect data from the three stakeholder groups: community, health-care, and academic research partners across three CTSAs. Concept mapping is a mixed-methods approach that allows participants to brainstorm and identify factors that contribute to a concept and describe ways in which those factors relate to each other. This study offers important insights on developing an initial set of trust measures that can be used across CTSAs to understand differences and similarities in conceptualization of trust among key stakeholder groups, track changes in public trust in research, identify both positive and negative aspects of trust, identify characteristics that maintain trust, and inform the direction for future research.