Comparison of mouth rinsing performance between adults and children using a contactless vital sensing camera
Comparison of mouth rinsing performance between adults and children using a contactless vital sensing camera
复制标题
使用非接触式生命传感摄像头比较成人和儿童的漱口性能
DOI：
10.1111/joor.13379
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Youichi Yamasaki
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hisako Kanada; Yushi Yamamoto; Hideo Sato; Kohei Chinju; Yuichi Ariyasu; Maria Kawaji; Yoichiro Iwashita; Makiko Hashiguchi; Youichi Yamasaki
背景：评价口腔清洁技能对评估口腔功能是有用的，但目前的评估方法是主观的。目的利用非接触式相机捕捉口腔运动，比较成人和儿童的口腔清洁情况。方法成人16例，儿童13例，无口腔功能障碍。采用微软Xbox One Kinect传感器®（Kinect）的紧凑型生命感测相机放置在距离地面100厘米和距离受试者120厘米处；分别取5、10、15 ml水作为样品。参与者被要求将样品放在口腔中，闭上嘴唇，左右交替移动样品15秒。通过单向方差分析分析每个样品离参考平面的最大/最小位移和冲洗周期。结果成人左、右口角最大、最小位移量不因标本量的不同而有显著差异。在儿童中，右侧最大值在5 -和15 - ml以及10 -和15 - ml样本之间存在显著差异，而左侧最大值在5 -和10 - ml以及5 -和15 - ml样本之间存在显著差异。正确的最小值在5 - ml和10 - ml样品之间有显著差异，5 - ml和15 - ml样品之间的漱口时间也有显著差异。结论儿童的唇动和漱口时间随样品体积的增大而减小。使用非接触式生命感应相机评估唇部运动对评估儿童口腔功能的发展是有用的。
BackgroundEvaluating mouth rinsing skills is useful for assessing oral function, however current evaluation methods are subjective.ObjectivesThis study compared mouth rinsing between adults and children using a contactless camera to capture lip motion.MethodsThe subjects comprised 16 adults and 13 children with no oral dysfunction. A compact vital sensing camera adapted from a Microsoft Xbox One Kinect Sensor® (Kinect) was placed 100 cm from the floor and 120 cm from the subject; 5, 10 and 15 ml of water were used as samples. Participants were instructed to hold the sample in the oral cavity, close the lips and move the sample alternatively left and right for 15 s. Maximum/minimum displacement from the reference plane and rinsing cycle for each sample were analysed by one‐way analysis of variance.ResultsIn adults, there was no significant difference in the maximum/minimum displacement between the left and right sides of the angulus oris due to differences in sample amount. In children, the right maximum significantly differed between the 5‐ and 15‐ml and 10‐ and 15‐ml samples, while the left maximum significantly differed between the 5‐ and 10‐ml and 5‐ and 15‐ml samples. The right minimum significantly differed between the 5‐ and 10‐ml samples, as did the duration of mouth rinsing between the 5‐ and 15‐ml samples.ConclusionsIn children, lip movement and mouth rinsing duration tended to decrease with increasing sample volume. Evaluating lip movement using a contactless vital sensing camera is useful for assessing children's development of oral function.