International Relations of Post-Hybridity
International Relations of Post-Hybridity
复制标题
后杂交时代的国际关系
DOI：
10.1080/14747731.2016.1143729
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Chih-Yu Shih and Josuke Ikeda
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
藤本灯;村上正和;岡安儀之;藤本灯・林禔映・田中草大・南雲千香子・小野響太;村上正和;岡安儀之;大塚修;岡安儀之;藤本灯・志村誠・津村昌祐・北﨑勇帆;藤本灯;大塚修;桑原俊介;大八木豪;桑原俊介;藤本灯;大塚修;塚原伸治;大塚修;大八木豪;藤本灯;桑原俊介;塚原伸治;大塚修;藤本灯;岩谷秋美;大八木豪;塚原伸治;Lucio de Sousa;岩谷秋美;Osamu OTSUKA;大八木豪;塚原伸治;Lucio de Sousa;Osamu OTSUKA;岩谷秋美;大八木豪;塚原伸治;Osamu OTSUKA;Lucio de Sousa;Lucio de Sousa;大塚修;Lucio de Sousa;鈴木伸子;Chih-Yu Shih and Josuke Ikeda
混杂性一词在全球化研究中正在失去其关键潜力，这既是因为没有人不再是混杂的，也是因为对混杂性的认识可能会鼓励暴力。尽管混杂最初表现为世界主义或后殖民主义，但它已经变成了一种颠覆性的庆祝活动，庆祝任何正统或正典的无效灌输。它也是被定位的主体性或能动性的证据，其独特的谱系不能完全通过模拟被认可的正统来包含。本文主张后杂合的出现，这是不同于杂合的假设，多层次，记忆，重新连接，最重要的是，非综合性的，但循环的历史编纂。它以香港为例，在那里，辩证和循环的存在模式都是中心，以澄清后杂交。本文主要是一个教学提醒，和补救措施，为教师和学生的国际关系的术语混杂的问题。
The term hybridity is losing its critical potential in the study of globalization, both because no one is not hybrid anymore and because awareness of hybridity might encourage violence. Whereas hybridity initially appeared as either cosmopolitanism or post-coloniality, it has however turned into a subversive celebration of unavailing indoctrination of any orthodoxy or canon. It is also the evidence of sited subjectivity or agency, whose unique genealogy cannot be entirely subsumed by simulating the sanctioned orthodox. This paper instead advocates the emergence of post-hybridity, which is different from hybridity in its assumption of multilayeredness, memory, reconnection, and, most importantly, non-synthetic and yet cyclical historiography. It uses the example of Hong Kong, where both dialectical and cyclical modes of existence are central, to clarify post-hybridity. The paper is primarily a pedagogical reminder of, and a remedy to, the problem of the term hybridity for the teachers and students of International Relations.