Economic evaluation of endoscopic sinus surgery versus continued medical therapy for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.
Economic evaluation of endoscopic sinus surgery versus continued medical therapy for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/lary.24916
复制
发表时间:
2015-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Smith, Timothy L.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rudmik, Luke;Soler, Zachary M.;Mace, Jess C.;Schlosser, Rodney J.;Smith, Timothy L.
关键词:
To evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) compared to continued medical therapy for patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Cohort-style Markov decision tree economic evaluation The economic perspective was the US third party payer with a 30 year time horizon. The two comparative treatment strategies were: 1) ESS followed by appropriate postoperative medical therapy and 2) continued medical therapy alone. Primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY). Costs were discounted at a rate of 3.5% in the reference case. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed including differing time-horizons, discounting scenarios, and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). The reference case demonstrated that the ESS strategy cost a total of $48,838.38 and produced a total of 20.50 QALYs. The medical therapy alone strategy cost a total of $28,948.98 and produced a total of 17.13 QALYs. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for ESS versus medical therapy alone is $5,901.90 per QALY. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve from the PSA demonstrated that there is 74% certainty that the ESS strategy is the most cost-effective decision for any willingness to pay threshold greater then $25,000. The time horizon analysis suggests that ESS becomes the cost-effective intervention within the 3rd year after surgery. Results from this study suggest that employing an ESS treatment strategy is the most cost-effective intervention compared to continued medical therapy alone for the long-term management of patients with refractory CRS.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7.2
作者:
Fokkens, Wytske J.;Lund, Valerie J.;Zwetsloot, Casper P.
通讯作者:
Zwetsloot, Casper P.
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
BLACK, WC
通讯作者:
BLACK, WC
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Bhattacharyya, Neil;Orlandi, Richard R.;Martinson, Melissa
通讯作者:
Martinson, Melissa
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
Au, Jennifer;Rudmik, Luke
通讯作者:
Rudmik, Luke
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Rudmik, Luke;Smith, Timothy L.;Schlosser, Rodney J.;Hwang, Peter H.;Mace, Jess C.;Soler, Zachary M.
通讯作者:
Soler, Zachary M.